Gizmo Lovers Will Be Sporadically Offline Due to Snow

Gizmo Lovers Logo A quick site update while I can. You may be aware of the freak October snow storm that hit New England this weekend, and if not – hey, we had a freak snow storm this weekend. The area I live in got dumped on pretty heavily. Heavy, wet snow + trees that have not yet lost their leaves = lots of downed trees and power lines.

I lost power at my house for about five hours on Sunday morning, but I got off easy. My domains, included GizmoLovers.com, are hosted on the Gweep.net freenet started by my circle of friends back in college. Unfortunately the main server location fared worse and has been without power since Sunday morning. The current estimate from the power company is that they may not have mains power back until late Thursday. Of course, we’re all hoping that’s a conservative estimate. For now the site will be offline much of the time, and back online periodically via generator. The servers are brought up for a few hours at a time as some of them are also mail servers for various domains (none of mine, I moved email to Google Apps last year) and this allows them to process queued messages.

This all means I most likely won’t be able to post much of anything until mains power is restored. And even if I do get a window to post, new posts will be unavailable much of the time as the server is offline. So please bear with me. A little server inconvenience is nothing compared to all of the people without power, which often means no heat, hot water, etc.

Thanks.

Posted in Site Updates | 8 Comments

Today Only – 50% Off Panasonic VIERA TC-L42E30 42-Inch 1080p 120Hz LED HDTV

Panasonic VIERA TC-L42E30 HDTV Today’s Amazon Gold Box Deal is the Panasonic VIERA TC-L42E30a 42-Inch 1080p 120Hz LED HDTV for $549.99 – half off the $1099.95 MSRP! And $100 off the non-Gold Box price they normally charge. Seems like a decent deal for an LED backlit set of that size.

Posted in Amazon, HDTV | Tagged , , , , | 3 Comments

Google Finally Opens Google+ to Google Apps Users, Like Myself

Google Logo I’ve been wanting to check out Google+ since it launched, but there was one small problem. You couldn’t sign up for Google+ with a Google Apps account, and last year I migrated everything over to Apps. I use Google Apps to host email for my personal domains, and I’ve hooked everything Google I use – Android, Docs, AdSense, Affiliate, etc. – to my Apps account. So I wasn’t about to sign up with a normal Gmail account and go through all the effort to setup G+ knowing I’d just have to do it again later. Especially as, historically, Google’s migration process to move things to Apps has been less than smooth.

But that changed tonight as they opened up G+ to GApps users. So I’ve gone ahead and signed up and took a first pass at fleshing out my profile. The lack of ‘vanity’ URLs reminds me of the bad old days of Facebook, which is not a good thing. I hope they come to their senses on that one.

Otherwise so far it seems OK, but I have to say I’m not blown away or anything. I don’t see a way to auto-feed Twitter into G+ for status updates, which is what I do on FB, and I don’t see myself switching to G+ clients for that. I was also surprised that YouTube has auto-sharing features for every other type of linked account they support, but not Google+. First impressions are that Google+ is less ‘open’ than FB. It seems to want to force you to do all of your updates and post content within its confines, while FB is happy to suck in activities from other sites like Twitter, YouTube, etc.

On the other hand the interface is, and I expect from Google, very clean and crisp. Not a lot of random crap splashed all over, a problem that has only been worsening on Facebook with their recent updates. The ‘Circles’ system of grouping people is pretty easy to understand and the privacy controls seen fairly straight forward. It seems to be missing some of the things I turn to FB for, like fan pages, community pages, etc. And no, Hangouts aren’t the same. The pages I spend most of my time using on FB are for companies like TiVo or communities of users. Not individuals. So I want to see that on G+. And when they’re available I’ll look to create one for Gizmo Loves, just as I did for Facebook.

The big question is, of course, if, or maybe I should say when, Google will suspend my account because of my name. They have a history of suspending accounts of monoymous users, due to their utterly idiotic ‘real names’ policy, so I fully expect them to waste my time proving I am who I claim to be too. I could rant for pages about the stupidity of their name policy, but plenty of others have already done so. I’ll try to to be brief.

I’ve been online since 1989. I’ve seen countless people using apparent ‘real names’ acting like complete jackasses. Using real names does not mean good behavior. In fact, there is already a growing problem with G+ users jumping into open Hangouts and trolling. And the accounts have names that look as ‘real’ as any others.

That highlights a key point that I’ve seen so many who support the policy miss. Google is not enforcing the use of real names. Not in the least. They are enforcing the use of real looking names. Of course, what looks real to them is a very narrow definition. Basically a European style first & last name with little to no cultural flexibility. Come from a culture where mononyms are common? Or where it is common to render your name in two character sets? Or have a name that sounds ‘funny’ to the Western ear? Or just have an unusual name? Be ready to have your account suspended and to be guilty until proven innocent.

And there have even been cases of people being told their legal name is unacceptable under the policy. Now that’s utter bullshit. Especially when any yahoo can pick a name out of the phone book. Want to be James Tucker? Or Brian Jones? Go ahead, it doesn’t matter if that’s your name or not. It looks real and there’s next to no chance you’ll get caught. And that’s what the trolls are doing now, creating disposable accounts with real looking names. A troll is a troll by any other name.

But the whole shtick about the policy being to encourage good behavior is a smokescreen anyway. It is really all about marketing. Google wants you to use a real name because they want to be able to compile a dossier and link it with other information sources to better target you with marketing and to productize you for marketers. Personally I don’t have a problem with them wanting to do that, that’s really what Google’s business is. Everything else, including search, is designed to feed that business. But the way they’re going about it is ham fisted and flawed.

There are many legitimate reasons to use a pseudonym online. It should be a choice. When you get down to it a nickname is a pseudonym. How many of you go by some variation of your legal name in daily life? If you go by Liz but were told you had to go by Elizabeth, would that bother you? Prefer your middle name over your legal first name? Too bad. No more Chip, you’re Charles now. OK, I’m going to stop before I do write pages. But check out My Name Is Me.

So, anyone want to start a betting pool on how long it’ll take Google to suspend my account? Remember, my legal name is just MegaZone.

Posted in Google | Tagged , | 1 Comment

EchoStar Preparing a Network DVR

EchoStar Logo EchoStar hasn’t been very successful in breaking into the US STB market. They, of course, continue to supply hardware to sister company Dish Network, but one of the objectives of splitting the companies apart was to allow EchoStar to provide hardware to other MVPDs. So far they’ve mostly come up empty, though they’re still pushing CableCARD SlingLoaded DVRs. But it looks like they’re trying a new angle – a network DVR (nDVR).. With a network DVR nothing is ‘recorded’ at the users home. There is no storage in the STB. Rather all of the storage lives at the head end and is streamed, generally via IPTV, to the STB ‘on demand’.

The user still has to request specific recordings, and a separate copy is kept for every user. If you and ten of your neighbors record the same program, eleven copies are kept on the head end. While this is inefficient and, frankly, stupid, from a technical standpoint, it is due to legal requirements. Cablevision is deploying nDVRs in some of their territories in NY and CT. They were sued by content providers over the nDVR – and won. But the ruling hinges on the fact that the nDVR works just like a ‘normal’ DVR with each user recording their own content. The functionality is the same, only the storage has moved from the customer’s home to the central office. Making one copy and providing access to multiple users would be redistribution, legally, and is a no-no. Hopefully someday the law will catch up to reality, but I’m not holding my breath.

There is one point in the Light Reading article reporting on this that I’m not sure I agree with:

That means EchoStar’s system will be built to store the individual programs a given customer sets to record, and won’t back up that data. So if a hard drive fails, all of the recorded content on that drive goes poof.

My understanding is that, while the ruling does require separate recordings for each user and would not allow backups, it doesn’t forbid using modern storage technology such as RAID. Indeed, there are some home DVRs that use RAID today. For the non-geeks, RAID is Redundant Array of Independent Drives. To over-simplify, picture to physical hard drives acting as one logical drive, with two copies of everything – one copy per drive. You only have the storage capacity of one drive, but you have redundancy – if one physical drive fails you don’t lose any data, it is safely on the other drive. And you can swap out the dead drive, copy everything over, and restore redundancy with nothing being lost. Since I’m sure EchoStar’s system will be using commercial grade storage arrays at the central office I’d be a bit surprised if they didn’t use some form of RAID or the equivalent.

Beyond the possibility of offering some form of redundancy, there are also economies of scale. Since a storage array will be shared across many users, even with redundant recordings the total raw storage space required to support a number of users, for the same number of recordings, is less than with individual drives in every home. It just works out to be a more efficient distribution with less wasted space. The environment in a data center is likely to be better for the drives than the average home too – clean, reliable power, good environmental controls, minimal vibration, etc. And since the recordings are already in the ‘cloud’, and EchoStar is of course the owner of placeshifting pioneer Sling Media, I would expect them to include the ability to stream your recordings to other devices. And that would be without requiring you to buy a Slingbox or use your broadband connection to send the data out of your home.

EchoStar says they’ll deliver the nDVR to their first customer by the end of 2012. While sister company Dish Network normally gets first dibs on new EchoStar products, I’m not sure that will be true this time. The problem with nDVRs is that they require sending different streams, possibly multiple streams, to every home. Imagine watching one show in the living room, while three other household members watch other recordings in other rooms. That’s four data streams into your home. Now all of your neighbors are doing the same. Satellite doesn’t do this well, it is best suited for sending the same content into multiple homes because of the fixed number of transponders. Even satellite data systems are more bandwidth limited than cable, fiber, or even DSL systems. They could have something tricky up their sleeves, like a wireless data play for delivery, but I think it is more likely that this will show up with a cable MSO. Very likely a second tier MSO looking for a technical edge, much as RCN & Suddenlink have turned to TiVo.

And speaking of TiVo, many view the nDVR as a threat to TiVo as their business has been built around placing ‘conventional’ DVRs into homes. But I disagree. TiVo’s main selling point is their UI, not the fact that the hard drive is in the STB. TiVo could just as easily split their product and create an nDVR. In fact, something like the TiVo Preview could easily be the STB client for an nDVR system. Right now it is designed to stream from a DVR in the home, but that data stream could just as easily be delivered into the home from remote storage. Exactly the same way OTT content is delivered to TiVo today. If demand for nDVRs takes off I’m sure we’ll see an nDVR from TiVo. The Virgin Media TiVo in the UK already has a DOCSIS modem and it looks like the upcoming 16.x software includes DOCSIS support, which could be hinting at future US products as well. And there is MoCA as well, which could communicate with an MSO gateway unit. Saying ‘data is data’ is a bit simplistic, but not too far off the mark.

In any case, it will be interesting to see if EchoStar gets more traction with their nDVR than they’ve achieved with their SlingLoaded cable products to date.

Via Light Reading.

Posted in Cable, Dish Network, DVR, EchoStar, Sling Media, TiVo | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Virgin Media has 222,000 TiVo Customers as of October 26th

Virgin Media TiVo When I made my post about all Virgin Media customers having TiVo in 4-5 years just about an hour ago I forgot that Virgin was announcing their latest financials. Well, they did and the news is good, especially in relation to TiVo:

Strong TiVo growth in the quarter; 162,900 TiVo customers at quarter-end
- 127,200 net adds, around one third of which are new to Virgin Media
- 222,000 TiVo customers as at 26th October

Note that the quarter ended September 30th with 162,900 TiVo customers and they now have 222,000. That means they’ve added 59,100 TiVo customers in just the past 26 days! I can see why they feel the need to add Samsung as a second hardware supplier. And if one third of those customers are new to Virgin Media, TiVo is clearly a major sales driver for them. I can certainly understand why they’ve been so bullish on TiVo since the launch if it is driving those kind of numbers. Even among existing subscribers TiVo is an upsell, so that’s good for business.

This reinforces what I’ve said before, TiVo’s future is going to hinge on MSO deals with retail being a secondary, niche market. We’re already seeing that with the TiVo Premiere Elite, which was clearly designed primarily to address the needs of cable MSOs (as the TiVo Premiere Q) with digital-cable only tuners and MoCA, with the same hardware brought to retail as a premium niche product. And the forthcoming TiVo Preview streaming unit, which as of yet still has no known retail plans but will be coming to MSOs. There is just more volume in MSO deals. With Virgin Media’s apparent runaway success marketing TiVo in the UK I wouldn’t be surprised to see more MSOs signing on with TiVo in the coming months.

Posted in DVR, TiVo | Tagged , | 2 Comments