Are You an RCN Cable Customer? You Could Test the TiVo Premiere Q/Elite & Preview

TiVo Premiere Elite TiVo’s new quad-tuner DVR was initially announced as the Premire Q for MSOs, and later as the Premiere Elite for retail, and honestly I’m not sure if the MSO model is still the ‘Q’ or if they’ll just go with friendlier ‘Elite’ moniker for both. But that’s not important.

What is important is that RCN is looking for five customers to test both the Premiere Q and the non-DVR Preview box. Jason Nealis, RCN’s Sr. Director, Video Product and Video Operations, posted in the forums at DSL Reports:

I need 1 customer. from DC , PA, MA, NY AND IL to get help with looking / testing and getting a feel for the new 4 Tuner Tivo (quad) and the new NON DVR TiVo Preview… SO…

I’m going to do a lottery / ping pong ball draft…

In order to qualify, you need to have

(2) TV’S .. HONESTLY I NEED THE BOTH TO BE HD if possible, you must have at least 1 HD!

(1) TV WILL GET THE TIVO QUAD TUNER

(1) TV WILL GET THE TIVO PREVIEW (NON DVR/ HD ONLY TIVO)

yes, btw you need to have RCN TV and internet.

———————————————————————-

PM / EMAIL me your :

NAME
RCN ACCOUNT #
and market (DC / PA / NY / MA / IL)
Email Address

———————————————————————-

I will collect these until 1159PM EST on Friday 9/2

then on our about 9/4 or 9/5 we will select 1 customer from each market to test these proposed BUNDLE of the TIVO Q and a TIVO PREVIEW… We may even do a live video selection lol
Our at the very least Internet Chat room …

Jason Nealis,
Sr. Director, Video Product and Video Operations

Jason’s a great guy, we worked together a bit earlier in our careers, back around ’96-’97.

So if you’re an RCN customer in DC , PA, MA, NY or IL and you have two TVs (at least one HD), you have a shot at beta testing the Premiere Q and Preview. (And if you wanted to write up a blog post for Gizmo Lovers I think we could work something out. ;-) )

Good luck!

Posted in DVR, TiVo | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

ONO Begins Customer TiVo Installations Tomorrow

ONO Logo It looks like the predictions of a September launch by ONO in Spain were spot on, as customers who’ve preordered will start getting their units installed tomorrow. Customers pay a one time €150 activation fee, and a €10 monthly fee – though customers who pre-order get their first six months of service free.

Via Rapid TV News.

Posted in Cable, DVR, TiVo | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Forget 16:9, 21:9 Is Where It Is At

21x9 vs 16x9 OK, maybe not where it is at, yet. But the Consumer Electronics Association (CEA) seems to feel it will be, or at least be common enough that it is worth working on a standard for signalling 21:9 content. The CEA is looking to update CEA 861, A DTV Profile for Uncompressed High-Speed Digital Interfaces, to include support for 21:9 signalling. Having a standard in place is important so that, as more vendors produce 21:9 displays, there is a unified way for content sources, like Blu-ray players, to communicate with the display to say “This is encoded for 21:9.” The display needs to be able to tell what the native resolution of the content is – such as 4:3, 16:9, or 21:9, to know how it should handle the display – letterboxing, pillarboxing, stretching, etc.

21:9 (which is more of a marketing term, it is really 64:27) approximates the 2.39 aspect ratio of many major films shot in anamorphic format. Most American films are 2.39 (anamorphic) or 1.85 (widescreen) these days. 16:9 is only 1.78, which requires letterboxing, horizontally compressing the image, or pan & scan when displaying a film, even at the lower aspect ratio. It is certainly better than the 1.33 aspect ration of our old, non-widescreen TVs, but 21:9 is the best ratio for viewing films.

However, as HDTV is shot for 16:9 displays, it is probably going to come down to what a given consumer watches the most. Someone who watches mostly TV is probably fine with a 16:9 display. The extra width would be wasted most of the time. Though you might use it for things like a social media scroll, PIP, etc., if you like to multitask. While consumers who watch mostly films may prefer 21:9 to get the full impact of an anamophic film. And with the CEA updating their standards, you’ll have the choice without worrying about compatibility.

Via TWICE.

Posted in HDTV | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

The Full HD 3D Glasses Initiative Gains Four Members

3D Glasses The Full HD 3D Glasses Initiative, the unwieldily named group formed by Sony, Samsung, Panasonic, and XPAND to establish a standard for active shutter 3D glasses, has welcomed four more members. Royal Philips Electronics, Sharp, Toshiba, and TCL have all jumped on board.

This is good for everyone – industry and consumer – but my earlier diatribe stands. I think Full HD Passive systems will be better in the long run than active shutter systems, standard glasses or not.

Via TWICE.

Posted in HDTV | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

TiVo Suffers a Teensy Trademark Setback in Spain

TiVo Logo As TiVo prepares to launch in Spain, they’ve run into a little snag. They wanted to get the TiVo.es domain, .es being the Spanish Top Level Domain (TLD), just like .us, .uk, .au, etc. Makes sense, right?

Except it is already taken, by one Majan Fernandez Primitivo. He’s a rock musician who goes by the stage name ‘Tivo’, derived from his last name. And he registered Tivo.es back in 2005 to use for self-promotion. It currently redirects to his MySpace page.

According to Domain Name Wire, TiVo filed a complaint with the World Intellectual Property Organization to try to claim the domain. But the arbitrator sided with Primtivo. After all, it is his stage name and legitimately part of his legal name. And he is using the site for legitimate purposes, not infringing on TiVo’s trademarks at all.

Frankly, I’m glad. The domain name dispute system is meant to work this way. If you register a domain in bad faith, to profit from the reputation of a trademark holder for example, and you have no legitimate claim to the name, then under the policy you should lose it. The idea is to prevent domain squatters from claiming trademarked domains with the sole intention of holding it hostage for a high price, or unscrupulous types setting up a scam site trading off of a reputable trademark.

But if you register a domain in good faith and have a legitimate claim to it, just because a corporation may use the same name as a trademark doesn’t give them the right to take it away.

It isn’t clear from the article, but I’m hoping they didn’t turn to WIPO as their first option. The right thing to do would be to approach Primtivo with an offer to acquire the domain and to try to negotiate a reasonable solution. Maybe offering him free ONO service and a TiVo DVR (presuming he lives in their service area), buy him a new domain, etc.

Perhaps he turned them down and they decided to try to play hard ball, which frankly still doesn’t sit well with me – just accept it and move on. But if they didn’t try to negotiate before, that seems to be the option now and they’re probably not starting from a good position. After all, if someone tried to rip one of my domains out of my hands I wouldn’t be very inclined to view them favorably in a subsequent negotiation.

In any case, it looks like TiVo already grabbed mytivo.es in June, 2010. It redirects to the TiVo homepage. (Maybe someone should point that to the ONO sign up page instead? Wouldn’t that make more sense guys?)

Via Domain Name Wire.

Posted in DVR, TiVo, Web | Tagged , , | 1 Comment