<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
><channel><title>Gizmo Lovers Blog &#187; V+</title> <atom:link href="http://www.gizmolovers.com/tag/v/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.gizmolovers.com</link> <description>TiVo, Slingbox, Android, Blu-ray Disc, and whatever other tech I feel like blogging about...</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 09:16:12 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator> <item><title>Virgin Media TiVo vs. V+: Round One, Fight!</title><link>http://www.gizmolovers.com/2011/07/21/virgin-media-tivo-vs-v-round-one-fight/</link> <comments>http://www.gizmolovers.com/2011/07/21/virgin-media-tivo-vs-v-round-one-fight/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 06:31:56 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>MegaZone</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Blogs]]></category> <category><![CDATA[TiVo]]></category> <category><![CDATA[V+]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Virgin Media]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmolovers.com/?p=4093</guid> <description><![CDATA[The incredibly unwieldily named blog Virgin Media High Definition &#038; TiVo Services posted a 17 point comparison between the new Virgin Media TiVo and their old V+ box. TiVo won, handily &#8211; 15 to 2. The only two points TiVo &#8230; <a
href="http://www.gizmolovers.com/2011/07/21/virgin-media-tivo-vs-v-round-one-fight/">Continue reading <span
class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a
href="http://vmhd.blogspot.com/2011/07/tivo-vs-v.html"><img
src="http://www.gizmolovers.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/TiVo_UK.png?9d7bd4" alt="Virgin Media TiVo" title="Virgin Media TiVo" width="300" height="90" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-3940" /></a> The incredibly unwieldily named blog <a
href="http://vmhd.blogspot.com/">Virgin Media High Definition &#038; TiVo Services</a> posted <a
href="http://vmhd.blogspot.com/2011/07/tivo-vs-v.html">a 17 point comparison between the new Virgin Media TiVo and their old V+ box</a>.  TiVo won, handily &#8211; 15 to 2.  The only two points TiVo lost on are speed:</p><blockquote><p>Speed. TIvo&#8217;s biggest problem is that it can be sluggish, especially compared to the V+ &#8211; but it&#8217;s not dramatic and it is more often than not faster. Searching TV on demand is significantly faster for example.</p></blockquote><p>It sounds like it didn&#8217;t lose that by much, and prevails in some cases.  And reliability:</p><blockquote><p>Reliability. By far the biggest issue I have with the Tivo is that if your internet connection is down, then yoru Tivo loses significant media &#8211; such as the discovery bar, TV Guide updates and programme info &#8211; and it errors and throws you out of certain options. A pain in the backside. V+ was far simpler than that and thus didn&#8217;t suffer network outages.</p></blockquote><p>I&#8217;d argue this one.  TiVo has more features, and many of those features rely on the broadband connection, and if your broadband is out of course they won&#8217;t work.  The old V+ didn&#8217;t have comparable features, and if something isn&#8217;t there at all it is hard for it to fail. <img
src="http://www.gizmolovers.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif?9d7bd4" alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p><p>Give <a
href="http://vmhd.blogspot.com/2011/07/tivo-vs-v.html">the whole thing</a> a read.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmolovers.com/2011/07/21/virgin-media-tivo-vs-v-round-one-fight/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: www.gizmolovers.com @ 2026-04-16 23:07:00 by W3 Total Cache -->