<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
><channel><title>Gizmo Lovers Blog &#187; Sharklets</title> <atom:link href="http://www.gizmolovers.com/tag/sharklets/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.gizmolovers.com</link> <description>TiVo, Slingbox, Android, Blu-ray Disc, and whatever other tech I feel like blogging about...</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 09:16:12 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator> <item><title>A Winglet By Any Other Name</title><link>http://www.gizmolovers.com/2012/05/23/a-winglet-by-any-other-name/</link> <comments>http://www.gizmolovers.com/2012/05/23/a-winglet-by-any-other-name/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 05:47:11 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>MegaZone</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Aerospace]]></category> <category><![CDATA[A320]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Airbus]]></category> <category><![CDATA[B737 MAX]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Boeing]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Sharklets]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Video]]></category> <category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmolovers.com/?p=9592</guid> <description><![CDATA[Airbus is launching a new winglet design for the A320 which they&#8217;ve dubbed &#8216;Sharklets&#8217;. Personally I hate the name, it sounds like someone let marketing run wild. They&#8217;re winglets, plain and simple. They&#8217;re basically Airbus&#8217;s version of the blended winglet, &#8230; <a
href="http://www.gizmolovers.com/2012/05/23/a-winglet-by-any-other-name/">Continue reading <span
class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a
href="http://youtu.be/rWiciXbTVUM"><img
src="http://www.gizmolovers.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/AIRBUS-Logo-300x72.jpg?9d7bd4" alt="AIRBUS Logo" title="AIRBUS Logo" width="300" height="72" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-8224" /></a> Airbus is launching a new winglet design for the A320 which they&#8217;ve dubbed &#8216;Sharklets&#8217;.  Personally I hate the name, it sounds like someone let marketing run wild.  They&#8217;re winglets, plain and simple.  They&#8217;re basically Airbus&#8217;s version of the blended winglet, like those on the Boeing 737.  (Note I&#8217;m not saying they copied Boeing, each winglet design is tailored for the aircraft it is on.  They&#8217;re not the same, they just have a similar appearance.)</p><p>I don&#8217;t think the Sharklets really look very much like a shark&#8217;s fin either.  Consider these grabs from Airbus&#8217;s own video:<br
/> <img
src="http://www.gizmolovers.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Airbus-Sharklet-Shark-fin.png?9d7bd4" alt="Airbus Sharklet - Shark fin" title="Airbus Sharklet - Shark fin" width="240" height="270" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-9593" style="margin-right: 0px;" /> <img
src="http://www.gizmolovers.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Airbus-Sharklet-Winglet.png?9d7bd4" alt="Airbus Sharklet - Winglet" title="Airbus Sharklet - Winglet" width="240" height="270" class="alignright size-full wp-image-9594" /> <br
clear="both" /><br
/> I suppose the leading edge profile is somewhat similar &#8211; of course that&#8217;s a CG fin which I&#8217;m sure was designed to match the Sharklet design.  OK, enough harping on the name.  It just makes me cringe each time I see it.</p><p>So anyway, they&#8217;re launching these new wing&#8230; er, <i>Shark</i>lets, with the first new build A320 produced with them.  They&#8217;ve released a couple of videos to coincide with the launch.<br
/> <iframe
width="500" height="369" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/rWiciXbTVUM?autohide=1" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe><br
/> <iframe
width="500" height="284" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/FqmcY2eMd2c?autohide=1" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p><p>But Airbus isn&#8217;t the only vendor unveiling a new winglet design, Boeing has unveiled their new &#8216;dual-feather&#8217; winglet design for the B737 MAX which they&#8217;re calling MAX AT (for Advanced Technology) winglets.  It&#8217;s a fairly different take in winglet design, with two pieces &#8211; one up-swept like a traditional winglet, and a second angled downward.  It looks a bit like the <a
href="http://www.aviationpartners.com/images/slider/rd-split-winglet-scimitartip.jpg" class="broken_link">Blended Split-Tip Scimitar Winglet</a> concept unveiled by Aviation Partners last year, but only superficially.  Boeing&#8217;s design seems to be a blend of a raked wingtip, as used on the B737-based P-8A Poseidon, with significant added anhedral, and the blended winglet they&#8217;ve been using.</p><p>They&#8217;ve released a video showing the updated B737 MAX design:<br
/> <iframe
width="500" height="284" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/o6A6arPgXVc?autohide=1" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p><p>The video features the dual-feather winglets, but also reveals a few other details of the evolving design.  The fan size of the CFMI LEAP-X1B has been increased, which has necessitated lengthening the nose gear to maintain ground clearance.  The longer nose gear wouldn&#8217;t fit in the existing nose gear bay and rather than make extensive engineering changes to the nose section they&#8217;ve added a small &#8216;blister&#8217; to enclose the longer gear.  The solution is similar to what Airbus did on the A330F, as it required a longer nose gear to level the load floor.  The B737 MAX also features a revised tailcone for reduced drag and a number of other detail changes.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmolovers.com/2012/05/23/a-winglet-by-any-other-name/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: www.gizmolovers.com @ 2026-04-13 13:17:16 by W3 Total Cache -->