<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Time Warner Cable Responds to TiVo&#8217;s Response to a NY Times Blog Entry about an Incident with Time Warner Cable.  Whew!</title> <atom:link href="http://www.gizmolovers.com/2011/09/15/time-warner-cable-responds-to-tivos-response-to-a-ny-times-blog-entry-about-an-incident-with-time-warner-cable-whew/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.gizmolovers.com/2011/09/15/time-warner-cable-responds-to-tivos-response-to-a-ny-times-blog-entry-about-an-incident-with-time-warner-cable-whew/</link> <description>TiVo, Slingbox, Android, Blu-ray Disc, and whatever other tech I feel like blogging about...</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2020 20:50:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator> <item><title>By: Jbtc2000</title><link>http://www.gizmolovers.com/2011/09/15/time-warner-cable-responds-to-tivos-response-to-a-ny-times-blog-entry-about-an-incident-with-time-warner-cable-whew/comment-page-1/#comment-28894</link> <dc:creator>Jbtc2000</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2012 01:43:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmolovers.com/?p=7966#comment-28894</guid> <description>I don’t think cable MSOs are the evil, conniving villains that some users paint them as. But I do think they’ve been pretty reluctant to accept CableCARD and properly support it with a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cfl4u.com/en/product/35A-Table-Fan.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;table fan&lt;/a&gt;,so it&#039;s can be</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don’t think cable MSOs are the evil, conniving villains that some users paint them as. But I do think they’ve been pretty reluctant to accept CableCARD and properly support it with a <a
href="http://www.cfl4u.com/en/product/35A-Table-Fan.html" rel="nofollow">table fan</a>,so it&#8217;s can be</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jbtc2000</title><link>http://www.gizmolovers.com/2011/09/15/time-warner-cable-responds-to-tivos-response-to-a-ny-times-blog-entry-about-an-incident-with-time-warner-cable-whew/comment-page-1/#comment-28895</link> <dc:creator>Jbtc2000</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2012 01:43:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmolovers.com/?p=7966#comment-28895</guid> <description>I don’t think cable MSOs are the evil, conniving villains that some users paint them as. But I do think they’ve been pretty reluctant to accept CableCARD and properly support it with a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cfl4u.com/en/product/35A-Table-Fan.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;table fan&lt;/a&gt;,so it&#039;s can be</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don’t think cable MSOs are the evil, conniving villains that some users paint them as. But I do think they’ve been pretty reluctant to accept CableCARD and properly support it with a <a
href="http://www.cfl4u.com/en/product/35A-Table-Fan.html" rel="nofollow">table fan</a>,so it&#8217;s can be</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jbtc2000</title><link>http://www.gizmolovers.com/2011/09/15/time-warner-cable-responds-to-tivos-response-to-a-ny-times-blog-entry-about-an-incident-with-time-warner-cable-whew/comment-page-1/#comment-28896</link> <dc:creator>Jbtc2000</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2012 01:43:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmolovers.com/?p=7966#comment-28896</guid> <description>I don’t think cable MSOs are the evil, conniving villains that some users paint them as. But I do think they’ve been pretty reluctant to accept CableCARD and properly support it with a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cfl4u.com/en/product/35A-Table-Fan.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;table fan&lt;/a&gt;,so it&#039;s can be</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don’t think cable MSOs are the evil, conniving villains that some users paint them as. But I do think they’ve been pretty reluctant to accept CableCARD and properly support it with a <a
href="http://www.cfl4u.com/en/product/35A-Table-Fan.html" rel="nofollow">table fan</a>,so it&#8217;s can be</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jbtc2000</title><link>http://www.gizmolovers.com/2011/09/15/time-warner-cable-responds-to-tivos-response-to-a-ny-times-blog-entry-about-an-incident-with-time-warner-cable-whew/comment-page-1/#comment-28897</link> <dc:creator>Jbtc2000</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2012 01:43:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmolovers.com/?p=7966#comment-28897</guid> <description>I don’t think cable MSOs are the evil, conniving villains that some users paint them as. But I do think they’ve been pretty reluctant to accept CableCARD and properly support it with a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cfl4u.com/en/product/35A-Table-Fan.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;table fan&lt;/a&gt;,so it&#039;s can be</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don’t think cable MSOs are the evil, conniving villains that some users paint them as. But I do think they’ve been pretty reluctant to accept CableCARD and properly support it with a <a
href="http://www.cfl4u.com/en/product/35A-Table-Fan.html" rel="nofollow">table fan</a>,so it&#8217;s can be</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: I'm legit</title><link>http://www.gizmolovers.com/2011/09/15/time-warner-cable-responds-to-tivos-response-to-a-ny-times-blog-entry-about-an-incident-with-time-warner-cable-whew/comment-page-1/#comment-28838</link> <dc:creator>I'm legit</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 02:30:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmolovers.com/?p=7966#comment-28838</guid> <description>Premiere XL with TA.  HBO on Demand goes away.  Alternative HBOGO  on Roku -- NOT!!  Evil Time Warner Cable won&#039;t allow HBOGO on Roku. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Premiere XL with TA.  HBO on Demand goes away.  Alternative HBOGO  on Roku &#8212; NOT!!  Evil Time Warner Cable won&#8217;t allow HBOGO on Roku.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: I'm legit</title><link>http://www.gizmolovers.com/2011/09/15/time-warner-cable-responds-to-tivos-response-to-a-ny-times-blog-entry-about-an-incident-with-time-warner-cable-whew/comment-page-1/#comment-28839</link> <dc:creator>I'm legit</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 02:30:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmolovers.com/?p=7966#comment-28839</guid> <description>Premiere XL with TA.  HBO on Demand goes away.  Alternative HBOGO  on Roku -- NOT!!  Evil Time Warner Cable won&#039;t allow HBOGO on Roku. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Premiere XL with TA.  HBO on Demand goes away.  Alternative HBOGO  on Roku &#8212; NOT!!  Evil Time Warner Cable won&#8217;t allow HBOGO on Roku.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Fanfoot</title><link>http://www.gizmolovers.com/2011/09/15/time-warner-cable-responds-to-tivos-response-to-a-ny-times-blog-entry-about-an-incident-with-time-warner-cable-whew/comment-page-1/#comment-28167</link> <dc:creator>Fanfoot</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 19:13:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmolovers.com/?p=7966#comment-28167</guid> <description>Well, there&#039;s at least two--the Cisco/Scientific Atlanta and the Motorola now Google TA&#039;s given the different head end architectures.  Course the Motorola&#039;s are better but rarely used since TWC is the big deployer of SDV...Better to move forward with AllVid.  TA&#039;s seem like too much of a kludge.  Course I say that not having to deal with them myself.  I&#039;m sure if I was  a TWC customer I&#039;d feel differently. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, there&#8217;s at least two&#8211;the Cisco/Scientific Atlanta and the Motorola now Google TA&#8217;s given the different head end architectures.  Course the Motorola&#8217;s are better but rarely used since TWC is the big deployer of SDV&#8230;</p><p>Better to move forward with AllVid.  TA&#8217;s seem like too much of a kludge.  Course I say that not having to deal with them myself.  I&#8217;m sure if I was  a TWC customer I&#8217;d feel differently.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Fanfoot</title><link>http://www.gizmolovers.com/2011/09/15/time-warner-cable-responds-to-tivos-response-to-a-ny-times-blog-entry-about-an-incident-with-time-warner-cable-whew/comment-page-1/#comment-28166</link> <dc:creator>Fanfoot</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 19:13:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmolovers.com/?p=7966#comment-28166</guid> <description>Well, there&#039;s at least two--the Cisco/Scientific Atlanta and the Motorola now Google TA&#039;s given the different head end architectures.  Course the Motorola&#039;s are better but rarely used since TWC is the big deployer of SDV...Better to move forward with AllVid.  TA&#039;s seem like too much of a kludge.  Course I say that not having to deal with them myself.  I&#039;m sure if I was  a TWC customer I&#039;d feel differently. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, there&#8217;s at least two&#8211;the Cisco/Scientific Atlanta and the Motorola now Google TA&#8217;s given the different head end architectures.  Course the Motorola&#8217;s are better but rarely used since TWC is the big deployer of SDV&#8230;</p><p>Better to move forward with AllVid.  TA&#8217;s seem like too much of a kludge.  Course I say that not having to deal with them myself.  I&#8217;m sure if I was  a TWC customer I&#8217;d feel differently.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Fanfoot</title><link>http://www.gizmolovers.com/2011/09/15/time-warner-cable-responds-to-tivos-response-to-a-ny-times-blog-entry-about-an-incident-with-time-warner-cable-whew/comment-page-1/#comment-28165</link> <dc:creator>Fanfoot</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 19:13:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmolovers.com/?p=7966#comment-28165</guid> <description>Well, there&#039;s at least two--the Cisco/Scientific Atlanta and the Motorola now Google TA&#039;s given the different head end architectures.  Course the Motorola&#039;s are better but rarely used since TWC is the big deployer of SDV...Better to move forward with AllVid.  TA&#039;s seem like too much of a kludge.  Course I say that not having to deal with them myself.  I&#039;m sure if I was  a TWC customer I&#039;d feel differently. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, there&#8217;s at least two&#8211;the Cisco/Scientific Atlanta and the Motorola now Google TA&#8217;s given the different head end architectures.  Course the Motorola&#8217;s are better but rarely used since TWC is the big deployer of SDV&#8230;</p><p>Better to move forward with AllVid.  TA&#8217;s seem like too much of a kludge.  Course I say that not having to deal with them myself.  I&#8217;m sure if I was  a TWC customer I&#8217;d feel differently.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: MegaZone</title><link>http://www.gizmolovers.com/2011/09/15/time-warner-cable-responds-to-tivos-response-to-a-ny-times-blog-entry-about-an-incident-with-time-warner-cable-whew/comment-page-1/#comment-28164</link> <dc:creator>MegaZone</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 16:30:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmolovers.com/?p=7966#comment-28164</guid> <description>Unfortunately, they can&#039;t.  UDCPs aren&#039;t allowed to have the HW for two-way communication - like the Tuning Adapter.  I&#039;m not sure Tuning Adapters are universally compatible either, so I&#039;m not sure what kind of HW they&#039;d have to include or if there might be different software loads to deal with different head end systems.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, they can&#8217;t.  UDCPs aren&#8217;t allowed to have the HW for two-way communication &#8211; like the Tuning Adapter.  I&#8217;m not sure Tuning Adapters are universally compatible either, so I&#8217;m not sure what kind of HW they&#8217;d have to include or if there might be different software loads to deal with different head end systems.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: MegaZone</title><link>http://www.gizmolovers.com/2011/09/15/time-warner-cable-responds-to-tivos-response-to-a-ny-times-blog-entry-about-an-incident-with-time-warner-cable-whew/comment-page-1/#comment-28163</link> <dc:creator>MegaZone</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 16:30:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmolovers.com/?p=7966#comment-28163</guid> <description>Unfortunately, they can&#039;t.  UDCPs aren&#039;t allowed to have the HW for two-way communication - like the Tuning Adapter.  I&#039;m not sure Tuning Adapters are universally compatible either, so I&#039;m not sure what kind of HW they&#039;d have to include or if there might be different software loads to deal with different head end systems.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, they can&#8217;t.  UDCPs aren&#8217;t allowed to have the HW for two-way communication &#8211; like the Tuning Adapter.  I&#8217;m not sure Tuning Adapters are universally compatible either, so I&#8217;m not sure what kind of HW they&#8217;d have to include or if there might be different software loads to deal with different head end systems.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tech Wizard</title><link>http://www.gizmolovers.com/2011/09/15/time-warner-cable-responds-to-tivos-response-to-a-ny-times-blog-entry-about-an-incident-with-time-warner-cable-whew/comment-page-1/#comment-28161</link> <dc:creator>Tech Wizard</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 12:35:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmolovers.com/?p=7966#comment-28161</guid> <description>MegaZone, I couldn&#039;t agree with you more. Any chance TiVo would consider embedding a Tuning Adapter in a variant of the Premiere? I would be willing to pay extra to eliminate an external 15W box from my TiVo setup. Its probably not worth it if Allvid becomes a reality but I can&#039;t see that happening on the major carriers for quite some time. My guess is that it would add about $100 to the cost of the platform to support SDV internally not to mention the development costs. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MegaZone, I couldn&#8217;t agree with you more. Any chance TiVo would consider embedding a Tuning Adapter in a variant of the Premiere? I would be willing to pay extra to eliminate an external 15W box from my TiVo setup. Its probably not worth it if Allvid becomes a reality but I can&#8217;t see that happening on the major carriers for quite some time. My guess is that it would add about $100 to the cost of the platform to support SDV internally not to mention the development costs.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: www.gizmolovers.com @ 2026-04-14 13:37:57 by W3 Total Cache -->