<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: EFF Campaign to Stop the FCC from Granting Integration Ban Waivers to Cable MSOs</title> <atom:link href="http://www.gizmolovers.com/2011/08/12/eff-campaign-to-stop-the-fcc-from-granting-integration-ban-waivers-to-cable-msos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.gizmolovers.com/2011/08/12/eff-campaign-to-stop-the-fcc-from-granting-integration-ban-waivers-to-cable-msos/</link> <description>TiVo, Slingbox, Android, Blu-ray Disc, and whatever other tech I feel like blogging about...</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2020 20:50:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator> <item><title>By: MegaZone</title><link>http://www.gizmolovers.com/2011/08/12/eff-campaign-to-stop-the-fcc-from-granting-integration-ban-waivers-to-cable-msos/comment-page-1/#comment-27836</link> <dc:creator>MegaZone</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 00:11:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmolovers.com/?p=4370#comment-27836</guid> <description>I bet it&#039;d be in the FCC filings - but be warned, this proceeding has been going on for a while.  This is the listing: http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs/proceeding/view?z=d9i8t&amp;name=97-80</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bet it&#8217;d be in the FCC filings &#8211; but be warned, this proceeding has been going on for a while.  This is the listing: http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs/proceeding/view?z=d9i8t&amp;name=97-80</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Matt Hickman</title><link>http://www.gizmolovers.com/2011/08/12/eff-campaign-to-stop-the-fcc-from-granting-integration-ban-waivers-to-cable-msos/comment-page-1/#comment-27835</link> <dc:creator>Matt Hickman</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 00:06:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmolovers.com/?p=4370#comment-27835</guid> <description>Any way I can find more information on &quot;content protection limits (encoding rules) in docket no. 97-80&quot;?  This sounds interesting.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any way I can find more information on &#8220;content protection limits (encoding rules) in docket no. 97-80&#8243;?  This sounds interesting.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Fanfoot</title><link>http://www.gizmolovers.com/2011/08/12/eff-campaign-to-stop-the-fcc-from-granting-integration-ban-waivers-to-cable-msos/comment-page-1/#comment-27814</link> <dc:creator>Fanfoot</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 03:16:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmolovers.com/?p=4370#comment-27814</guid> <description>Ditto.  Filed a comment myself.  Given the formal nature of the filing, I resisted editing it with my own thoughts (DTA&#039;s are evil, grab the cable cos by the balls, push AllVid but don&#039;t let them screw it up with DRM, etc).  That might have been a mistake? Also posted a note to Dave Zatz on his site, hoping he&#039;ll cover it as well.BTW, I really would like to see your thoughts on the Google/Motorola acquisition, either here on as a comment on Dave&#039;s post.  Do you think they&#039;ll keep it?  If they do will they try to put Google TV in a Motorola STB?  Will any cable cos bite?  Would they have to go retail?  Would that work?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ditto.  Filed a comment myself.  Given the formal nature of the filing, I resisted editing it with my own thoughts (DTA&#8217;s are evil, grab the cable cos by the balls, push AllVid but don&#8217;t let them screw it up with DRM, etc).  That might have been a mistake? </p><p>Also posted a note to Dave Zatz on his site, hoping he&#8217;ll cover it as well.</p><p>BTW, I really would like to see your thoughts on the Google/Motorola acquisition, either here on as a comment on Dave&#8217;s post.  Do you think they&#8217;ll keep it?  If they do will they try to put Google TV in a Motorola STB?  Will any cable cos bite?  Would they have to go retail?  Would that work?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Fanfoot</title><link>http://www.gizmolovers.com/2011/08/12/eff-campaign-to-stop-the-fcc-from-granting-integration-ban-waivers-to-cable-msos/comment-page-1/#comment-27815</link> <dc:creator>Fanfoot</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 03:16:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmolovers.com/?p=4370#comment-27815</guid> <description>Ditto.  Filed a comment myself.  Given the formal nature of the filing, I resisted editing it with my own thoughts (DTA&#039;s are evil, grab the cable cos by the balls, push AllVid but don&#039;t let them screw it up with DRM, etc).  That might have been a mistake? Also posted a note to Dave Zatz on his site, hoping he&#039;ll cover it as well.BTW, I really would like to see your thoughts on the Google/Motorola acquisition, either here on as a comment on Dave&#039;s post.  Do you think they&#039;ll keep it?  If they do will they try to put Google TV in a Motorola STB?  Will any cable cos bite?  Would they have to go retail?  Would that work?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ditto.  Filed a comment myself.  Given the formal nature of the filing, I resisted editing it with my own thoughts (DTA&#8217;s are evil, grab the cable cos by the balls, push AllVid but don&#8217;t let them screw it up with DRM, etc).  That might have been a mistake? </p><p>Also posted a note to Dave Zatz on his site, hoping he&#8217;ll cover it as well.</p><p>BTW, I really would like to see your thoughts on the Google/Motorola acquisition, either here on as a comment on Dave&#8217;s post.  Do you think they&#8217;ll keep it?  If they do will they try to put Google TV in a Motorola STB?  Will any cable cos bite?  Would they have to go retail?  Would that work?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tech Wizard</title><link>http://www.gizmolovers.com/2011/08/12/eff-campaign-to-stop-the-fcc-from-granting-integration-ban-waivers-to-cable-msos/comment-page-1/#comment-27806</link> <dc:creator>Tech Wizard</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 21:03:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmolovers.com/?p=4370#comment-27806</guid> <description>MegaZone, thanks for alerting us to the EFF initiative. It was enlightening reading many of the filings from TiVo and others on 97-80. I drafted and submitted a filing a few minutes ago that also expands on what the EFF is requesting. I asked the commission to revisit the two-box Tuning Adapter solution which TiVo pointed out in a 2010 filing was a temporary solution and is a choke-point for adoption of retail devices. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MegaZone, thanks for alerting us to the EFF initiative. It was enlightening reading many of the filings from TiVo and others on 97-80. I drafted and submitted a filing a few minutes ago that also expands on what the EFF is requesting. I asked the commission to revisit the two-box Tuning Adapter solution which TiVo pointed out in a 2010 filing was a temporary solution and is a choke-point for adoption of retail devices.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: www.gizmolovers.com @ 2026-04-14 20:36:43 by W3 Total Cache -->