<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: New TiVo OS Update Removes Unofficial Premiere-to-Premiere Streaming</title> <atom:link href="http://www.gizmolovers.com/2011/07/23/new-tivo-os-update-removes-unofficial-premiere-to-premiere-streaming/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.gizmolovers.com/2011/07/23/new-tivo-os-update-removes-unofficial-premiere-to-premiere-streaming/</link> <description>TiVo, Slingbox, Android, Blu-ray Disc, and whatever other tech I feel like blogging about...</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2020 20:50:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator> <item><title>By: MegaZone</title><link>http://www.gizmolovers.com/2011/07/23/new-tivo-os-update-removes-unofficial-premiere-to-premiere-streaming/comment-page-1/#comment-27676</link> <dc:creator>MegaZone</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 04:40:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmolovers.com/?p=4182#comment-27676</guid> <description>I think you guys are being too harsh.  Remember, this is in development, and I doubt TiVo did this update just to kill the feature.  It is clearly incomplete.  What if the current level of implementation has serious issues - what if it has memory leaks that cause crashes or cause other failures, like a failure to record because some runaway process steps on something else?  There are any number of legitimate reasons they could have turned it off - including it not being deliberate, but that it being on in the first place is a bug that they&#039;ve simply fixed.Deliberately making it available in any form requires it to meet some minimal level of functionality and ensuring it doesn&#039;t cause broader problems.  We know it was buggy, users who played with it reported a number of bugs.  But we don&#039;t know how bad those bugs might be - users only see the surface symptoms, or may not associated other glitches with this feature, thinking them unrelated.We got a glimpse of what they&#039;re working on, and it seemed to work so-so.  But that doesn&#039;t mean there weren&#039;t serious issues with it being used in the current state that we just don&#039;t know about.In the end, it was clearly not ready for prime time - and given the bugs reported by those who used it, not even ready for a public beta.  It seems to be alpha, maybe early beta, and I don&#039;t have a problem with TiVo taking it back into the shop to do more work before letting the public have a go at it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you guys are being too harsh.  Remember, this is in development, and I doubt TiVo did this update just to kill the feature.  It is clearly incomplete.  What if the current level of implementation has serious issues &#8211; what if it has memory leaks that cause crashes or cause other failures, like a failure to record because some runaway process steps on something else?  There are any number of legitimate reasons they could have turned it off &#8211; including it not being deliberate, but that it being on in the first place is a bug that they&#8217;ve simply fixed.</p><p>Deliberately making it available in any form requires it to meet some minimal level of functionality and ensuring it doesn&#8217;t cause broader problems.  We know it was buggy, users who played with it reported a number of bugs.  But we don&#8217;t know how bad those bugs might be &#8211; users only see the surface symptoms, or may not associated other glitches with this feature, thinking them unrelated.</p><p>We got a glimpse of what they&#8217;re working on, and it seemed to work so-so.  But that doesn&#8217;t mean there weren&#8217;t serious issues with it being used in the current state that we just don&#8217;t know about.</p><p>In the end, it was clearly not ready for prime time &#8211; and given the bugs reported by those who used it, not even ready for a public beta.  It seems to be alpha, maybe early beta, and I don&#8217;t have a problem with TiVo taking it back into the shop to do more work before letting the public have a go at it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Sam Biller</title><link>http://www.gizmolovers.com/2011/07/23/new-tivo-os-update-removes-unofficial-premiere-to-premiere-streaming/comment-page-1/#comment-27675</link> <dc:creator>Sam Biller</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2011 12:01:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmolovers.com/?p=4182#comment-27675</guid> <description>They should release it in a public beta allowing any interested Premiere user to sign-up for it. This would be a win-win for TiVo in my view. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They should release it in a public beta allowing any interested Premiere user to sign-up for it. This would be a win-win for TiVo in my view.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dave Zatz</title><link>http://www.gizmolovers.com/2011/07/23/new-tivo-os-update-removes-unofficial-premiere-to-premiere-streaming/comment-page-1/#comment-27673</link> <dc:creator>Dave Zatz</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2011 23:31:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmolovers.com/?p=4182#comment-27673</guid> <description>&quot;TiVo was damned if they did and damned if they didn’t.&quot;Except it was mostly hidden. They should have left it be.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;TiVo was damned if they did and damned if they didn’t.&#8221;</p><p>Except it was mostly hidden. They should have left it be.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Rojcowles</title><link>http://www.gizmolovers.com/2011/07/23/new-tivo-os-update-removes-unofficial-premiere-to-premiere-streaming/comment-page-1/#comment-27669</link> <dc:creator>Rojcowles</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2011 12:54:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmolovers.com/?p=4182#comment-27669</guid> <description>I played with it a little bit but only to stream Tivo Podcasts from one Premiere to the other as we can do MRV, no CCI bit, , and then only because I could.  Even then it did seem a bit flaky so no big loss here. I did also try and stream an Amazon VOD movie from one to the other but that, reasonably enough, was blocked from streaming as well as MRV.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I played with it a little bit but only to stream Tivo Podcasts from one Premiere to the other as we can do MRV, no CCI bit, , and then only because I could.  Even then it did seem a bit flaky so no big loss here. I did also try and stream an Amazon VOD movie from one to the other but that, reasonably enough, was blocked from streaming as well as MRV.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Rojcowles</title><link>http://www.gizmolovers.com/2011/07/23/new-tivo-os-update-removes-unofficial-premiere-to-premiere-streaming/comment-page-1/#comment-27670</link> <dc:creator>Rojcowles</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2011 12:54:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmolovers.com/?p=4182#comment-27670</guid> <description>I played with it a little bit but only to stream Tivo Podcasts from one Premiere to the other as we can do MRV, no CCI bit, , and then only because I could.  Even then it did seem a bit flaky so no big loss here. I did also try and stream an Amazon VOD movie from one to the other but that, reasonably enough, was blocked from streaming as well as MRV.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I played with it a little bit but only to stream Tivo Podcasts from one Premiere to the other as we can do MRV, no CCI bit, , and then only because I could.  Even then it did seem a bit flaky so no big loss here. I did also try and stream an Amazon VOD movie from one to the other but that, reasonably enough, was blocked from streaming as well as MRV.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: www.gizmolovers.com @ 2026-04-15 11:54:20 by W3 Total Cache -->