<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Heads-Up for a Small Subset of Computer Users</title> <atom:link href="http://www.gizmolovers.com/2008/05/13/heads-up-for-a-small-subset-of-computer-users/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.gizmolovers.com/2008/05/13/heads-up-for-a-small-subset-of-computer-users/</link> <description>TiVo, Slingbox, Android, Blu-ray Disc, and whatever other tech I feel like blogging about...</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2020 20:50:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator> <item><title>By: Gryphon</title><link>http://www.gizmolovers.com/2008/05/13/heads-up-for-a-small-subset-of-computer-users/comment-page-1/#comment-24318</link> <dc:creator>Gryphon</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 20:47:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmolovers.com/?p=2502#comment-24318</guid> <description>As far as I know, the HP problem only affects their desktop systems with AMD processors; laptops should be in the clear.  I guess they used a different master disk image for those (which stands to reason).  Disabling intelppm on those systems wouldn&#039;t hurt anything, but it&#039;s probably not there in the first place.That does remind me, though, of a caveat that seems kind of obvious, but bears repeating: If you have a system with an &lt;b&gt;Intel&lt;/b&gt; processor and SP3 is giving you trouble, it&#039;s not for the same cause; &lt;b&gt;do not disable this driver.&lt;/b&gt;  Doing so will make the system not work in other, less easily remedied ways.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as I know, the HP problem only affects their desktop systems with AMD processors; laptops should be in the clear.  I guess they used a different master disk image for those (which stands to reason).  Disabling intelppm on those systems wouldn&#8217;t hurt anything, but it&#8217;s probably not there in the first place.</p><p>That does remind me, though, of a caveat that seems kind of obvious, but bears repeating: If you have a system with an <b>Intel</b> processor and SP3 is giving you trouble, it&#8217;s not for the same cause; <b>do not disable this driver.</b> Doing so will make the system not work in other, less easily remedied ways.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Brian Purcell</title><link>http://www.gizmolovers.com/2008/05/13/heads-up-for-a-small-subset-of-computer-users/comment-page-1/#comment-24314</link> <dc:creator>Brian Purcell</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 18:43:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmolovers.com/?p=2502#comment-24314</guid> <description>My wife uses an HP laptop with Windows XP and AMD.  I already installed SP3 before this notification, but I didn&#039;t have any problems.  Should I still go through the steps (after the fact) to make sure there are no future problems?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My wife uses an HP laptop with Windows XP and AMD.  I already installed SP3 before this notification, but I didn&#8217;t have any problems.  Should I still go through the steps (after the fact) to make sure there are no future problems?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: www.gizmolovers.com @ 2026-04-13 15:15:00 by W3 Total Cache -->