<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Gizmo Lovers Logo Finalists</title> <atom:link href="http://www.gizmolovers.com/2008/04/01/gizmo-lovers-logo-finalists/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.gizmolovers.com/2008/04/01/gizmo-lovers-logo-finalists/</link> <description>TiVo, Slingbox, Android, Blu-ray Disc, and whatever other tech I feel like blogging about...</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2020 20:50:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator> <item><title>By: And The Winner Is&#8230; &#124; Gizmo Lovers Blog</title><link>http://www.gizmolovers.com/2008/04/01/gizmo-lovers-logo-finalists/comment-page-1/#comment-27863</link> <dc:creator>And The Winner Is&#8230; &#124; Gizmo Lovers Blog</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 07:00:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmolovers.com/2008/04/01/gizmo-lovers-logo-finalists/#comment-27863</guid> <description>[...] logo, while the solid colored variant can be used on printed materials. Somewhat amusingly reader unteins pretty much summed up my thinking in his comment on the finalists post.The design is clean and simple, and is very clear from a distance. It scales [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] logo, while the solid colored variant can be used on printed materials. Somewhat amusingly reader unteins pretty much summed up my thinking in his comment on the finalists post.The design is clean and simple, and is very clear from a distance. It scales [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dot</title><link>http://www.gizmolovers.com/2008/04/01/gizmo-lovers-logo-finalists/comment-page-1/#comment-23426</link> <dc:creator>Dot</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 22:49:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmolovers.com/2008/04/01/gizmo-lovers-logo-finalists/#comment-23426</guid> <description>I like #7.  The robot conveys the idea that the website will assist you in your TIVO tasks.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like #7.  The robot conveys the idea that the website will assist you in your TIVO tasks.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Paul</title><link>http://www.gizmolovers.com/2008/04/01/gizmo-lovers-logo-finalists/comment-page-1/#comment-23418</link> <dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 15:06:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmolovers.com/2008/04/01/gizmo-lovers-logo-finalists/#comment-23418</guid> <description>I vote for #3.  Good 3D effect.  It is nifty.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I vote for #3.  Good 3D effect.  It is nifty.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tony</title><link>http://www.gizmolovers.com/2008/04/01/gizmo-lovers-logo-finalists/comment-page-1/#comment-23415</link> <dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 02:44:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmolovers.com/2008/04/01/gizmo-lovers-logo-finalists/#comment-23415</guid> <description>I like #3.  Good 3D effect.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like #3.  Good 3D effect.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Scott Urman</title><link>http://www.gizmolovers.com/2008/04/01/gizmo-lovers-logo-finalists/comment-page-1/#comment-23405</link> <dc:creator>Scott Urman</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:53:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmolovers.com/2008/04/01/gizmo-lovers-logo-finalists/#comment-23405</guid> <description>I vote for number 3.  The 3-d effect is nifty.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I vote for number 3.  The 3-d effect is nifty.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David</title><link>http://www.gizmolovers.com/2008/04/01/gizmo-lovers-logo-finalists/comment-page-1/#comment-23403</link> <dc:creator>David</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 16:09:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmolovers.com/2008/04/01/gizmo-lovers-logo-finalists/#comment-23403</guid> <description>I like 3 and 7.  3 stands out I think because of the 3D.  But when it is by itself I think it might not look as good.  It looks good next to all the other similar ones.  I like 7 because it is cute and simple and memorable I think.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like 3 and 7.  3 stands out I think because of the 3D.  But when it is by itself I think it might not look as good.  It looks good next to all the other similar ones.  I like 7 because it is cute and simple and memorable I think.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: MegaZone</title><link>http://www.gizmolovers.com/2008/04/01/gizmo-lovers-logo-finalists/comment-page-1/#comment-23400</link> <dc:creator>MegaZone</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 15:41:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmolovers.com/2008/04/01/gizmo-lovers-logo-finalists/#comment-23400</guid> <description>Stile - 2&amp;3 are by the same person and 4&amp;5 are by another person, 1, 6, &amp; 7 are all by different people.  In other words, five different people created the seven entries I posted.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stile &#8211; 2&#038;3 are by the same person and 4&#038;5 are by another person, 1, 6, &#038; 7 are all by different people.  In other words, five different people created the seven entries I posted.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: unteins</title><link>http://www.gizmolovers.com/2008/04/01/gizmo-lovers-logo-finalists/comment-page-1/#comment-23395</link> <dc:creator>unteins</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 02:56:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmolovers.com/2008/04/01/gizmo-lovers-logo-finalists/#comment-23395</guid> <description>I say #1.Step away from the computer screen, say 3-5 feet at least and I think it is the only one that reads cleanly from far away. I think that is a key component of any logo. If you want to use it on anything other than a website especially, it needs to read from a distance. I am picturing t-shirts and conventions, that sort of thing.I think the clever small banner ad design of #3 could easily be adapted to work with #1. None of the other designs has a the contrast and punch needed to be a solid logo in my opinion. I also don&#039;t think any of the typography in the other entries is well matched to the logo.#1 seems to have gotten the basic concept of a bold, memorable logo and also nailed the fine details such as type that compliments the logo. The 3D effect looks good to me for the webpage, with the flat version being excellently suited to business cards, t-shirts, etc.#1 could use a bit of polish, but other than that, it is, in my opinion, head and shoulders above the others.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I say #1.</p><p>Step away from the computer screen, say 3-5 feet at least and I think it is the only one that reads cleanly from far away. I think that is a key component of any logo. If you want to use it on anything other than a website especially, it needs to read from a distance. I am picturing t-shirts and conventions, that sort of thing.</p><p>I think the clever small banner ad design of #3 could easily be adapted to work with #1. None of the other designs has a the contrast and punch needed to be a solid logo in my opinion. I also don&#8217;t think any of the typography in the other entries is well matched to the logo.</p><p>#1 seems to have gotten the basic concept of a bold, memorable logo and also nailed the fine details such as type that compliments the logo. The 3D effect looks good to me for the webpage, with the flat version being excellently suited to business cards, t-shirts, etc.</p><p>#1 could use a bit of polish, but other than that, it is, in my opinion, head and shoulders above the others.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Kathi</title><link>http://www.gizmolovers.com/2008/04/01/gizmo-lovers-logo-finalists/comment-page-1/#comment-23392</link> <dc:creator>Kathi</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 23:57:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmolovers.com/2008/04/01/gizmo-lovers-logo-finalists/#comment-23392</guid> <description>Number 7!!!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Number 7!!!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Cory</title><link>http://www.gizmolovers.com/2008/04/01/gizmo-lovers-logo-finalists/comment-page-1/#comment-23390</link> <dc:creator>Cory</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 22:26:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmolovers.com/2008/04/01/gizmo-lovers-logo-finalists/#comment-23390</guid> <description>All interesting feedback so far.  I think the reason they look so similar is that MZ provided some pretty specific ideas - for example, the G with the gears - in his original post.  I think MZ can confirm that none of them are from that same person.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All interesting feedback so far.  I think the reason they look so similar is that MZ provided some pretty specific ideas &#8211; for example, the G with the gears &#8211; in his original post.  I think MZ can confirm that none of them are from that same person.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Stile</title><link>http://www.gizmolovers.com/2008/04/01/gizmo-lovers-logo-finalists/comment-page-1/#comment-23388</link> <dc:creator>Stile</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 22:22:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmolovers.com/2008/04/01/gizmo-lovers-logo-finalists/#comment-23388</guid> <description>Ooops, sorry...I just noticed your post asking for what we liked or disliked.Well...1, 2, 3, and 6 are all pretty much the same.  I honestly get the impression they were all submitted by one person trying to rig the election, so to speak.  4 is close enough to 1,2,3 and 6 to be cousins.  That really boils down to three real entries, and out of the three, I prefer remote, robot, and gear in that order.  When you say gizmo, any good gizmo is going to have a remote.  A robot IS a gizmo (and may even have a remote), so gets a close second.  As for the gears, they just make me think of Inspector Gadget...and he&#039;s cool and all, but this is GIZMO Lovers, not GADGET Lovers.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ooops, sorry&#8230;I just noticed your post asking for what we liked or disliked.</p><p>Well&#8230;1, 2, 3, and 6 are all pretty much the same.  I honestly get the impression they were all submitted by one person trying to rig the election, so to speak.  4 is close enough to 1,2,3 and 6 to be cousins.  That really boils down to three real entries, and out of the three, I prefer remote, robot, and gear in that order.  When you say gizmo, any good gizmo is going to have a remote.  A robot IS a gizmo (and may even have a remote), so gets a close second.  As for the gears, they just make me think of Inspector Gadget&#8230;and he&#8217;s cool and all, but this is GIZMO Lovers, not GADGET Lovers.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Stile</title><link>http://www.gizmolovers.com/2008/04/01/gizmo-lovers-logo-finalists/comment-page-1/#comment-23387</link> <dc:creator>Stile</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 22:12:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmolovers.com/2008/04/01/gizmo-lovers-logo-finalists/#comment-23387</guid> <description>Number 5 is alive.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Number 5 is alive.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Justin</title><link>http://www.gizmolovers.com/2008/04/01/gizmo-lovers-logo-finalists/comment-page-1/#comment-23386</link> <dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 22:01:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmolovers.com/2008/04/01/gizmo-lovers-logo-finalists/#comment-23386</guid> <description>Number 3 looks like the best to my eyes.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Number 3 looks like the best to my eyes.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Glenn</title><link>http://www.gizmolovers.com/2008/04/01/gizmo-lovers-logo-finalists/comment-page-1/#comment-23385</link> <dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 21:34:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmolovers.com/2008/04/01/gizmo-lovers-logo-finalists/#comment-23385</guid> <description>Number 3.I like the 3D, and I love the little banner ad.  Very cool.  I do like the tilted heart in number 6 though, so I might be inclined to tilt the heart at an angle, i.e. sometimes gadgets break my heart a little.  Or something.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Number 3.</p><p>I like the 3D, and I love the little banner ad.  Very cool.  I do like the tilted heart in number 6 though, so I might be inclined to tilt the heart at an angle, i.e. sometimes gadgets break my heart a little.  Or something.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jack</title><link>http://www.gizmolovers.com/2008/04/01/gizmo-lovers-logo-finalists/comment-page-1/#comment-23381</link> <dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 20:11:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmolovers.com/2008/04/01/gizmo-lovers-logo-finalists/#comment-23381</guid> <description>No offense to the artists (because I couldn&#039;t make anything that looks even half way decent), but I do not like any of the submissions.  How about a HDTV (with legs and arms) sucking face with a Blu-Ray player.  :-)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No offense to the artists (because I couldn&#8217;t make anything that looks even half way decent), but I do not like any of the submissions.  How about a HDTV (with legs and arms) sucking face with a Blu-Ray player. <img
src="http://www.gizmolovers.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif?9d7bd4" alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Andrew</title><link>http://www.gizmolovers.com/2008/04/01/gizmo-lovers-logo-finalists/comment-page-1/#comment-23380</link> <dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 19:32:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmolovers.com/2008/04/01/gizmo-lovers-logo-finalists/#comment-23380</guid> <description>#1 -- and I agree it needs a few tweaks to clean up the heart edges</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#1 &#8212; and I agree it needs a few tweaks to clean up the heart edges</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: MegaZone</title><link>http://www.gizmolovers.com/2008/04/01/gizmo-lovers-logo-finalists/comment-page-1/#comment-23378</link> <dc:creator>MegaZone</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 19:28:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmolovers.com/2008/04/01/gizmo-lovers-logo-finalists/#comment-23378</guid> <description>Wow... I think you guys are actually making it &lt;i&gt;harder&lt;/i&gt;.  I&#039;d like to know what you like, or dislike, about the designs that made you pick the one you did.I think that no matter what I go with some people are going to be unhappy with my choice.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow&#8230; I think you guys are actually making it <i>harder</i>.  I&#8217;d like to know what you like, or dislike, about the designs that made you pick the one you did.</p><p>I think that no matter what I go with some people are going to be unhappy with my choice.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chris</title><link>http://www.gizmolovers.com/2008/04/01/gizmo-lovers-logo-finalists/comment-page-1/#comment-23377</link> <dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 18:50:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmolovers.com/2008/04/01/gizmo-lovers-logo-finalists/#comment-23377</guid> <description>#7 most definitely.  Keeps the feel of the TiVo Guy.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#7 most definitely.  Keeps the feel of the TiVo Guy.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Michelle</title><link>http://www.gizmolovers.com/2008/04/01/gizmo-lovers-logo-finalists/comment-page-1/#comment-23373</link> <dc:creator>Michelle</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 17:53:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmolovers.com/2008/04/01/gizmo-lovers-logo-finalists/#comment-23373</guid> <description>I vote for number 7</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I vote for number 7</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Harvey</title><link>http://www.gizmolovers.com/2008/04/01/gizmo-lovers-logo-finalists/comment-page-1/#comment-23369</link> <dc:creator>Harvey</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 16:54:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmolovers.com/2008/04/01/gizmo-lovers-logo-finalists/#comment-23369</guid> <description>I agree completely with Janet.  Although Number 7 did not steal my heart (a young woman did that years ago) Number 7 does have the most originality.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree completely with Janet.  Although Number 7 did not steal my heart (a young woman did that years ago) Number 7 does have the most originality.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Brad</title><link>http://www.gizmolovers.com/2008/04/01/gizmo-lovers-logo-finalists/comment-page-1/#comment-23366</link> <dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 16:46:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmolovers.com/2008/04/01/gizmo-lovers-logo-finalists/#comment-23366</guid> <description>I vote for number 3</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I vote for number 3</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Janet</title><link>http://www.gizmolovers.com/2008/04/01/gizmo-lovers-logo-finalists/comment-page-1/#comment-23362</link> <dc:creator>Janet</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 15:55:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmolovers.com/2008/04/01/gizmo-lovers-logo-finalists/#comment-23362</guid> <description>Number 7 stole my heart!  You need originality and #7 gives it to you with a punch!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Number 7 stole my heart!  You need originality and #7 gives it to you with a punch!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Kathleen</title><link>http://www.gizmolovers.com/2008/04/01/gizmo-lovers-logo-finalists/comment-page-1/#comment-23358</link> <dc:creator>Kathleen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 15:39:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmolovers.com/2008/04/01/gizmo-lovers-logo-finalists/#comment-23358</guid> <description>I&#039;m sorry you didn&#039;t like mine.Out of these, 3 is definitely my favorite.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry you didn&#8217;t like mine.</p><p>Out of these, 3 is definitely my favorite.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Scarymike</title><link>http://www.gizmolovers.com/2008/04/01/gizmo-lovers-logo-finalists/comment-page-1/#comment-23356</link> <dc:creator>Scarymike</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 13:45:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmolovers.com/2008/04/01/gizmo-lovers-logo-finalists/#comment-23356</guid> <description>I personally like number 3.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally like number 3.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Phil</title><link>http://www.gizmolovers.com/2008/04/01/gizmo-lovers-logo-finalists/comment-page-1/#comment-23355</link> <dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 13:06:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmolovers.com/2008/04/01/gizmo-lovers-logo-finalists/#comment-23355</guid> <description>I vote for 3,7,1. In that order.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I vote for 3,7,1. In that order.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: www.gizmolovers.com @ 2026-04-15 09:37:24 by W3 Total Cache -->