<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Visiting With XStreamHD</title> <atom:link href="http://www.gizmolovers.com/2008/01/13/visiting-with-xstreamhd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.gizmolovers.com/2008/01/13/visiting-with-xstreamhd/</link> <description>TiVo, Slingbox, Android, Blu-ray Disc, and whatever other tech I feel like blogging about...</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2020 20:50:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator> <item><title>By: MegaZone</title><link>http://www.gizmolovers.com/2008/01/13/visiting-with-xstreamhd/comment-page-1/#comment-22240</link> <dc:creator>MegaZone</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 22:42:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.tivolovers.com/2008/01/13/visiting-with-xstreamhd/#comment-22240</guid> <description>Hmm, I use &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.coralcdn.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;CoralCDN&lt;/a&gt; to avoid crushing my server.  Sometimes they hiccup - usually it comes back fairly quickly.Good point on the ATSC.  Their data sheets say UHF, channels 14-69.  So they&#039;re pretty specific, which means it probably isn&#039;t an over-sight.  I don&#039;t know why they would exclude VHF, since dual-frequency tuner blocks are common.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, I use <a
href="http://www.coralcdn.org/" rel="nofollow">CoralCDN</a> to avoid crushing my server.  Sometimes they hiccup &#8211; usually it comes back fairly quickly.</p><p>Good point on the ATSC.  Their data sheets say UHF, channels 14-69.  So they&#8217;re pretty specific, which means it probably isn&#8217;t an over-sight.  I don&#8217;t know why they would exclude VHF, since dual-frequency tuner blocks are common.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chris H</title><link>http://www.gizmolovers.com/2008/01/13/visiting-with-xstreamhd/comment-page-1/#comment-22239</link> <dc:creator>Chris H</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 22:37:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.tivolovers.com/2008/01/13/visiting-with-xstreamhd/#comment-22239</guid> <description>FYI, your pics aren&#039;t working.The UHF-only limit for ATSC is significant.  There may not be many VHF digital OTA channels today (though there certainly are some), but after shutdown next year, MOST OTA channels will be relocating down to VHF frequencies -- usually identical to their original analog freqs, but not necessarily.  UHF (especially high UHF) is the portion of the spectrum being freed up for re-allocation.  So...unless they change that, I wouldn&#039;t count on the OTA recording function much.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FYI, your pics aren&#8217;t working.</p><p>The UHF-only limit for ATSC is significant.  There may not be many VHF digital OTA channels today (though there certainly are some), but after shutdown next year, MOST OTA channels will be relocating down to VHF frequencies &#8212; usually identical to their original analog freqs, but not necessarily.  UHF (especially high UHF) is the portion of the spectrum being freed up for re-allocation.  So&#8230;unless they change that, I wouldn&#8217;t count on the OTA recording function much.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ben Drawbaugh</title><link>http://www.gizmolovers.com/2008/01/13/visiting-with-xstreamhd/comment-page-1/#comment-22237</link> <dc:creator>Ben Drawbaugh</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 18:27:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.tivolovers.com/2008/01/13/visiting-with-xstreamhd/#comment-22237</guid> <description>I agree 100% and really hope they succeed.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree 100% and really hope they succeed.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: MegaZone</title><link>http://www.gizmolovers.com/2008/01/13/visiting-with-xstreamhd/comment-page-1/#comment-22236</link> <dc:creator>MegaZone</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 18:09:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.tivolovers.com/2008/01/13/visiting-with-xstreamhd/#comment-22236</guid> <description>They had videos running and such, but it looked like it was smoke and mirrors - they have Blu-ray players and PS3s setup and it looked to me like the video was playing from those.  They didn&#039;t actually demo the units for me.I think the hardware is real, but there is a lot more to launching the product.  They don&#039;t have any content deals in place, and that&#039;s the key right there.  They also wouldn&#039;t talk about which satellite they were using, just that it was an existing bird.*If* they can launch what they&#039;re promising it will be pretty impressive.  But that does seem like a big if.  They&#039;ve done a lot of work developing the box, so I&#039;m hoping they pull the rest together.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They had videos running and such, but it looked like it was smoke and mirrors &#8211; they have Blu-ray players and PS3s setup and it looked to me like the video was playing from those.  They didn&#8217;t actually demo the units for me.</p><p>I think the hardware is real, but there is a lot more to launching the product.  They don&#8217;t have any content deals in place, and that&#8217;s the key right there.  They also wouldn&#8217;t talk about which satellite they were using, just that it was an existing bird.</p><p>*If* they can launch what they&#8217;re promising it will be pretty impressive.  But that does seem like a big if.  They&#8217;ve done a lot of work developing the box, so I&#8217;m hoping they pull the rest together.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ben Drawbaugh</title><link>http://www.gizmolovers.com/2008/01/13/visiting-with-xstreamhd/comment-page-1/#comment-22234</link> <dc:creator>Ben Drawbaugh</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:33:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.tivolovers.com/2008/01/13/visiting-with-xstreamhd/#comment-22234</guid> <description>Was the demo working when you were there?
We stopped by twice and it wasn&#039;t working either time.As much as I&#039;d love to see this product make it to market, it seems to good to be true. If it does make it, I&#039;ll be the first to sign up.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was the demo working when you were there?<br
/> We stopped by twice and it wasn&#8217;t working either time.</p><p>As much as I&#8217;d love to see this product make it to market, it seems to good to be true. If it does make it, I&#8217;ll be the first to sign up.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: www.gizmolovers.com @ 2026-04-13 19:42:06 by W3 Total Cache -->