<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: DirecTV Buys (The Remains of) ReplayTV</title> <atom:link href="http://www.gizmolovers.com/2007/12/13/directv-buys-the-remains-of-replaytv/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.gizmolovers.com/2007/12/13/directv-buys-the-remains-of-replaytv/</link> <description>TiVo, Slingbox, Android, Blu-ray Disc, and whatever other tech I feel like blogging about...</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2020 20:50:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator> <item><title>By: MegaZone</title><link>http://www.gizmolovers.com/2007/12/13/directv-buys-the-remains-of-replaytv/comment-page-1/#comment-22530</link> <dc:creator>MegaZone</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 20:16:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.tivolovers.com/2007/12/13/directv-buys-the-remains-of-replaytv/#comment-22530</guid> <description>Susan - There are a few solutions to the issues you mention:
1. The system sounds can be set to low, medium, high - or off.  So you can turn off the sounds completely.  I actually like it, I find the audible feedback quite useful.2. The progress bar has a &#039;quick clear&#039; setting to make it go away faster.  And if you press &#039;Clear&#039; on the remote it will go away immediately.3. The copying vs. streaming isn&#039;t so bad.  You can watch the program while it is still copying, so you don&#039;t have to wait for it, and while it will use disk space while copying and viewing, you can immediately delete it.  It would still be nice for TiVo to add streaming at some point, but having the ability to copy is nice too.  Though I don&#039;t use it much anymore, since my main TiVo is a dual-tuner S3.  I used to use my bedroom TiVo as a second tuner and then copy shows to the living room regularly.  Now I don&#039;t need to do that.The need for two cable boxes would be solved by a dual-tuner DVR, like the TiVo Series3 or TiVo HD.  Not only dual-tuners, but native digital cable support, including HD recording.I&#039;m a fairly hardcore geek, and I prefer TiVo to ReplayTV for a number of reasons.  I tried them both before buying my first TiVo in 2002.  I felt the TiVo was more powerful and even geekier than the RTV, because of the ability to do advanced scheduling with WishLists and all of the hacks available since it runs Linux.  There is an even higher geek factor now, with Home Media Engine.ReplayTV was a good product, and the only real direct competition TiVo ever had, but they just couldn&#039;t seem to get traction in the market.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Susan &#8211; There are a few solutions to the issues you mention:<br
/> 1. The system sounds can be set to low, medium, high &#8211; or off.  So you can turn off the sounds completely.  I actually like it, I find the audible feedback quite useful.</p><p>2. The progress bar has a &#8216;quick clear&#8217; setting to make it go away faster.  And if you press &#8216;Clear&#8217; on the remote it will go away immediately.</p><p>3. The copying vs. streaming isn&#8217;t so bad.  You can watch the program while it is still copying, so you don&#8217;t have to wait for it, and while it will use disk space while copying and viewing, you can immediately delete it.  It would still be nice for TiVo to add streaming at some point, but having the ability to copy is nice too.  Though I don&#8217;t use it much anymore, since my main TiVo is a dual-tuner S3.  I used to use my bedroom TiVo as a second tuner and then copy shows to the living room regularly.  Now I don&#8217;t need to do that.</p><p>The need for two cable boxes would be solved by a dual-tuner DVR, like the TiVo Series3 or TiVo HD.  Not only dual-tuners, but native digital cable support, including HD recording.</p><p>I&#8217;m a fairly hardcore geek, and I prefer TiVo to ReplayTV for a number of reasons.  I tried them both before buying my first TiVo in 2002.  I felt the TiVo was more powerful and even geekier than the RTV, because of the ability to do advanced scheduling with WishLists and all of the hacks available since it runs Linux.  There is an even higher geek factor now, with Home Media Engine.</p><p>ReplayTV was a good product, and the only real direct competition TiVo ever had, but they just couldn&#8217;t seem to get traction in the market.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Susan</title><link>http://www.gizmolovers.com/2007/12/13/directv-buys-the-remains-of-replaytv/comment-page-1/#comment-22526</link> <dc:creator>Susan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 17:56:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.tivolovers.com/2007/12/13/directv-buys-the-remains-of-replaytv/#comment-22526</guid> <description>That is the saddest thing I have read in a while. I love my replaytvs. I think the things I disliked about Tivos the most initially was that annoying sound it makes, the horrible bar that pops up on the lower screen every time you press any button and covers the subtiles (so you can&#039;t check how much movie is left and watch it t the same time), and that you can&#039;t stream between units. It actually downloads a copy to the other tivo, taking up that machine&#039;s hard drive.I want my replaytv units to be useful forever - ha ha. I am already frustrated that digital tuning will require me to have multiple cable boxes in one location (since I have picture-picture and want to record while I watch something else). They are really designing entertainment technology for simpletons and not for the geekier crowd in my opinion.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is the saddest thing I have read in a while. I love my replaytvs. I think the things I disliked about Tivos the most initially was that annoying sound it makes, the horrible bar that pops up on the lower screen every time you press any button and covers the subtiles (so you can&#8217;t check how much movie is left and watch it t the same time), and that you can&#8217;t stream between units. It actually downloads a copy to the other tivo, taking up that machine&#8217;s hard drive.</p><p>I want my replaytv units to be useful forever &#8211; ha ha. I am already frustrated that digital tuning will require me to have multiple cable boxes in one location (since I have picture-picture and want to record while I watch something else). They are really designing entertainment technology for simpletons and not for the geekier crowd in my opinion.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: MegaZone</title><link>http://www.gizmolovers.com/2007/12/13/directv-buys-the-remains-of-replaytv/comment-page-1/#comment-21902</link> <dc:creator>MegaZone</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 21:53:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.tivolovers.com/2007/12/13/directv-buys-the-remains-of-replaytv/#comment-21902</guid> <description>The DirecTV for Vista project seems to have faded away - neither camp has mentioned it in a long time.  And when it was announced the idea was that it would add DTV support to Vista&#039;s build in Media Center, so I wouldn&#039;t expect them to need, or even want, 3rd party software involved.I&#039;ll try to find out what&#039;s up at CES.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The DirecTV for Vista project seems to have faded away &#8211; neither camp has mentioned it in a long time.  And when it was announced the idea was that it would add DTV support to Vista&#8217;s build in Media Center, so I wouldn&#8217;t expect them to need, or even want, 3rd party software involved.</p><p>I&#8217;ll try to find out what&#8217;s up at CES.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: HDTiVo</title><link>http://www.gizmolovers.com/2007/12/13/directv-buys-the-remains-of-replaytv/comment-page-1/#comment-21900</link> <dc:creator>HDTiVo</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 20:48:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.tivolovers.com/2007/12/13/directv-buys-the-remains-of-replaytv/#comment-21900</guid> <description>The first thing that came to mind is that quite some time ago DTV and MSFT announced they were working to bring DTV tuner to the Windows PC, and perhaps the software from Replay could play a role.Do you know what has happended to the idea?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first thing that came to mind is that quite some time ago DTV and MSFT announced they were working to bring DTV tuner to the Windows PC, and perhaps the software from Replay could play a role.</p><p>Do you know what has happended to the idea?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: MegaZone</title><link>http://www.gizmolovers.com/2007/12/13/directv-buys-the-remains-of-replaytv/comment-page-1/#comment-21899</link> <dc:creator>MegaZone</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 17:37:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.tivolovers.com/2007/12/13/directv-buys-the-remains-of-replaytv/#comment-21899</guid> <description>First, the points you listed:
- Automatic commercial skip - gone.  It was removed in the 5500 and is unlikely to return as it was lawsuit bait.  The 5500 does have a one-press skip which is OK, TiVo has 30 second skip.  Both work.
- Unlimited buffer.  Sure - but big deal.  I&#039;ve been active in the DVR community for over 5 years, and very, very, very rarely do people say &quot;I wish I had an unlimited live buffer.&quot;  RTV is the only DVR I know of that did that, which also shows you how much demand there is.
- Recording from other sources.  The DVD TiVos do that officially.  Other TiVos have had a &#039;backdoor&#039; - tune to channel 0 to record whatever from the A/V input.  And you can manually tune a TiVo to a channel number if you need to.  Also, *any* DVR lets you record from other A/V inputs by the simple expedient of *lying*.  Connect your source instead of a cable box, or whatever, and tell it to record some time on any channel, then play your source.  The DVR will happily record it.  And you can also transfer video from a computer to the TiVo, officially.
- Line 1, Line 2, and RF3 input - what exactly good are this for the normal user?  Serious question.  I don&#039;t even see RTV fanatics touting these.
- Better A/V quality.  1. Moot with digital sources like digital cable, ATSC, or satellite.  The DVR records the pre-compressed digital signal.  What you receive is what you record.  And for analog models, this is opinion, not fact.  And it has been hotly debated for years - since the two products launched actually.  You&#039;ll find plenty of people who claim TiVo looks better than RTV, and plenty of people who claim that RTV looks better than TiVo.  The fact is that they both encode MPEG-2 on the fly with single pass encoding, and they have different MPEG-2 settings.  That means that RTV may very well look better on some content, and TiVo can look better on other content - when the content is best suited for their MPEG settings.  There have been a number of A/B tests with RTV and TiVo over the years, with no common result.  ALSO, it depends GREATLY which models you mean.  With TiVo the S1, S2, DVD combo, S3, and TiVo HD all have *different* MPEG settings.  The S1 and S2 boxes record at 480x480 for Best and High, for example, while the DVD units record at 720x480 and at much higher bitrates.  The S3 and TiVo also record at much higher bitrates.  So the image quality on those units is markedly better at higher settings than on the other units.  And it isn&#039;t even constant over time, TiVo tweaks the MPEG settings periodically in new releases.So a blanket statement of &#039;RTV looks better than TiVo&#039; is hogwash.  &#039;And RTV 5000 looks better than a TiVo Series2 on Content X&#039; would be a better statement.Also: &lt;blockquote&gt;Multi-tuners and HD are features that RTV would have easily added had they still been around.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Thanks for making my point - the code is STALE.  The fact they they HAVEN&#039;T been around, and therefore HAVEN&#039;T evolved the code to keep up with the market, is kind of the definition of the code being stale!Now, to counter:
- TiVo has a much better recording management system with clear, priority based conflict resolution.  This is the number one thing even RTV fanatics will state.  And RTV even shifted their system to partially copy TiVo in the 5.1 software.  But they didn&#039;t do a complete job.
- TiVo has Wishlists, which are incredibly useful and powerful.  RTV doesn&#039;t have a decent equivalent.
- TiVo has native USB WiFi support.  RTV promised that and didn&#039;t deliver.
- TiVo allows you to view digital photos over the network.  RTV&#039;s photo support requires you to hard partition the drive to dedicate space to photos, then *copy* the photos to the RTV.
- TiVo supports network playback of digital music.  RTV promised it and didn&#039;t deliver.
- TiVo supports online recording requests - WITHOUT any blackout window.  Even on broadband RTV has a 24-hour blackout window.  You&#039;d think they were still using modems.  Oh, and TiVo has partnered with Yahoo!, AOL, TVGuide, and Zap2it.com so you can schedule recordings from all of those sites too.
- TiVo supports movie rentals and purchases from Amazon Unbox.  RTV talked about broadband features and never delivered.
- TiVo also has TiVoCast content, free video downloads.
- TiVo has a slew of broadband features - Yahoo! Traffic &amp; Weather, Fandango movie tickets, Live365 &amp; Rhapsody music, Music Choice free music videos, Picasa and Photobucket viewing, podcasts, etc.  RTV - nada.
- TiVo also has the Home Media Engine API for 3rd party applications, which allows for sites like Apps.tv and PlayTeeVee.com, as well as 3rd party applications like Galleon and AudioFaucet.  TiVo has a LOT more 3rd party support than RTV - which mainly has DVArchive.
- TiVo has official support for transferring video from the TiVo to a PC, and from a PC to the TiVo.  RTV doesn&#039;t - it only works because RTV didn&#039;t secure their box-to-box protocol.  (Which DTV would pretty much have to secure to get away with a new box in the market.)
- TiVo has KidZone, which many parents love.
- TiVo has searching that spans local and broadband content in one search, Guru Guides, and other unique features.
- TiVo actually has a To Do List!  (I oculdn&#039;t resist that dig - it has long been one of the major complaints from RTV owners.)
- TiVo has TiVo Suggestions, which is a nice feature.  (And if you don&#039;t like it, just ignore it - or turn it off.)
- TiVo&#039;s code is Linux based and there is a large, active hacking community offering many options.  RTV&#039;s code runs on a commercial, proprietary embedded RTOS and there are basically no hacks to run on the box itself because of that.RTV does have a few features that I&#039;d like to see TiVo add.  While it isn&#039;t officially supported, RTV has an API on the box that lets you control a lot of the functions over the network.  I&#039;d like to see TiVo expand their current API to be more like that.  RTV shows which programs will record in the Guide, TiVo doesn&#039;t.  And that&#039;s always been kind of disappointing - even though I don&#039;t use Live TV, or the Guide, well - EVER - I think it should be there for those who do.RTV had component outputs first (and VGA on some units IIRC, I don&#039;t feel like looking it up now).  TiVo didn&#039;t get those until the DVD units, and now on the S3 and HD.  Of course, the latter also have HDMI now.RTV has some other bells and whistles, like being able to jump to a specific minute/second - but while those are nice &#039;gee-whiz&#039; things, as a geek, they aren&#039;t really that useful as general consumer features.TiVo always had features RTV lacked, and vice-versa.  Having tried both, I felt TiVo was simply a better DVR - it had a MUCH clearer, more reliable scheduling system and Wishlists, which were the most important functions for a DVR.  Everything else was just extra.  RTV&#039;s scheduling system, with theme channels, etc, was obtuse and overly complex.  (Which is why RTV eventually partially copied TiVo.)  Both RTV and TiVo continued to add features - but RTV stopped over four years ago, and TiVo picked up their pace.  RTV talked about DVD combo units (I heard the interview with a SonicBlue exec myself) - TiVo delivered the product.  TiVo delivered dual tuners.  Then HD and CableCARD.A LOT of work would need to be done to RTV&#039;s code base to:
1. Port it to modern hardware, dual tuners, refresh the UI, etc.
2. Add support for DBS tuners, and probably OTA ATSC tuners as well (as DirecTVs consumer HD DVRs support ATSC and satellite).
3. Add features to at least give it market parity to be competitive.  It would, at a minimum, need to do as much as the DirecTiVos and NDS DirecTV DVRs.And, to make all of this harder, you&#039;d have to get engineers to first decipher the existing code base.  One of the hardest things to do as a developer is to take someone else&#039;s code, especially stale code, and first understand what it is all doing - and WHY it is doing it that way.  It is difficult when you have the engineers who wrote it as resources, it is damn frustrating when you don&#039;t.  If the reports that all the old RTV engineers are long gone are true, it would be a difficult task.  And it isn&#039;t exactly a simple code base.TiVo already has working DirecTiVo code.  In fact, it would be trivial for them to make it feature competitive with the standalone boxes - the code is in there, just disabled by DirecTV&#039;s request.  DirecTV and TiVo have already announced a code update for the existing boxes in 2008 - that could easily be the basis for a new platform.  And, speaking of new platforms, the TiVo HD was designed as a reference platform that can be readily re-purposed for new markets - like DVB-T for Australia.  Supporting DBS for DirecTV wouldn&#039;t be hard.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, the points you listed:<br
/> - Automatic commercial skip &#8211; gone.  It was removed in the 5500 and is unlikely to return as it was lawsuit bait.  The 5500 does have a one-press skip which is OK, TiVo has 30 second skip.  Both work.<br
/> - Unlimited buffer.  Sure &#8211; but big deal.  I&#8217;ve been active in the DVR community for over 5 years, and very, very, very rarely do people say &#8220;I wish I had an unlimited live buffer.&#8221;  RTV is the only DVR I know of that did that, which also shows you how much demand there is.<br
/> - Recording from other sources.  The DVD TiVos do that officially.  Other TiVos have had a &#8216;backdoor&#8217; &#8211; tune to channel 0 to record whatever from the A/V input.  And you can manually tune a TiVo to a channel number if you need to.  Also, *any* DVR lets you record from other A/V inputs by the simple expedient of *lying*.  Connect your source instead of a cable box, or whatever, and tell it to record some time on any channel, then play your source.  The DVR will happily record it.  And you can also transfer video from a computer to the TiVo, officially.<br
/> - Line 1, Line 2, and RF3 input &#8211; what exactly good are this for the normal user?  Serious question.  I don&#8217;t even see RTV fanatics touting these.<br
/> - Better A/V quality.  1. Moot with digital sources like digital cable, ATSC, or satellite.  The DVR records the pre-compressed digital signal.  What you receive is what you record.  And for analog models, this is opinion, not fact.  And it has been hotly debated for years &#8211; since the two products launched actually.  You&#8217;ll find plenty of people who claim TiVo looks better than RTV, and plenty of people who claim that RTV looks better than TiVo.  The fact is that they both encode MPEG-2 on the fly with single pass encoding, and they have different MPEG-2 settings.  That means that RTV may very well look better on some content, and TiVo can look better on other content &#8211; when the content is best suited for their MPEG settings.  There have been a number of A/B tests with RTV and TiVo over the years, with no common result.  ALSO, it depends GREATLY which models you mean.  With TiVo the S1, S2, DVD combo, S3, and TiVo HD all have *different* MPEG settings.  The S1 and S2 boxes record at 480&#215;480 for Best and High, for example, while the DVD units record at 720&#215;480 and at much higher bitrates.  The S3 and TiVo also record at much higher bitrates.  So the image quality on those units is markedly better at higher settings than on the other units.  And it isn&#8217;t even constant over time, TiVo tweaks the MPEG settings periodically in new releases.</p><p>So a blanket statement of &#8216;RTV looks better than TiVo&#8217; is hogwash.  &#8216;And RTV 5000 looks better than a TiVo Series2 on Content X&#8217; would be a better statement.</p><p>Also:<br
/><blockquote>Multi-tuners and HD are features that RTV would have easily added had they still been around.</p></blockquote><p>Thanks for making my point &#8211; the code is STALE.  The fact they they HAVEN&#8217;T been around, and therefore HAVEN&#8217;T evolved the code to keep up with the market, is kind of the definition of the code being stale!</p><p>Now, to counter:<br
/> - TiVo has a much better recording management system with clear, priority based conflict resolution.  This is the number one thing even RTV fanatics will state.  And RTV even shifted their system to partially copy TiVo in the 5.1 software.  But they didn&#8217;t do a complete job.<br
/> - TiVo has Wishlists, which are incredibly useful and powerful.  RTV doesn&#8217;t have a decent equivalent.<br
/> - TiVo has native USB WiFi support.  RTV promised that and didn&#8217;t deliver.<br
/> - TiVo allows you to view digital photos over the network.  RTV&#8217;s photo support requires you to hard partition the drive to dedicate space to photos, then *copy* the photos to the RTV.<br
/> - TiVo supports network playback of digital music.  RTV promised it and didn&#8217;t deliver.<br
/> - TiVo supports online recording requests &#8211; WITHOUT any blackout window.  Even on broadband RTV has a 24-hour blackout window.  You&#8217;d think they were still using modems.  Oh, and TiVo has partnered with Yahoo!, AOL, TVGuide, and Zap2it.com so you can schedule recordings from all of those sites too.<br
/> - TiVo supports movie rentals and purchases from Amazon Unbox.  RTV talked about broadband features and never delivered.<br
/> - TiVo also has TiVoCast content, free video downloads.<br
/> - TiVo has a slew of broadband features &#8211; Yahoo! Traffic &#038; Weather, Fandango movie tickets, Live365 &#038; Rhapsody music, Music Choice free music videos, Picasa and Photobucket viewing, podcasts, etc.  RTV &#8211; nada.<br
/> - TiVo also has the Home Media Engine API for 3rd party applications, which allows for sites like Apps.tv and PlayTeeVee.com, as well as 3rd party applications like Galleon and AudioFaucet.  TiVo has a LOT more 3rd party support than RTV &#8211; which mainly has DVArchive.<br
/> - TiVo has official support for transferring video from the TiVo to a PC, and from a PC to the TiVo.  RTV doesn&#8217;t &#8211; it only works because RTV didn&#8217;t secure their box-to-box protocol.  (Which DTV would pretty much have to secure to get away with a new box in the market.)<br
/> - TiVo has KidZone, which many parents love.<br
/> - TiVo has searching that spans local and broadband content in one search, Guru Guides, and other unique features.<br
/> - TiVo actually has a To Do List!  (I oculdn&#8217;t resist that dig &#8211; it has long been one of the major complaints from RTV owners.)<br
/> - TiVo has TiVo Suggestions, which is a nice feature.  (And if you don&#8217;t like it, just ignore it &#8211; or turn it off.)<br
/> - TiVo&#8217;s code is Linux based and there is a large, active hacking community offering many options.  RTV&#8217;s code runs on a commercial, proprietary embedded RTOS and there are basically no hacks to run on the box itself because of that.</p><p>RTV does have a few features that I&#8217;d like to see TiVo add.  While it isn&#8217;t officially supported, RTV has an API on the box that lets you control a lot of the functions over the network.  I&#8217;d like to see TiVo expand their current API to be more like that.  RTV shows which programs will record in the Guide, TiVo doesn&#8217;t.  And that&#8217;s always been kind of disappointing &#8211; even though I don&#8217;t use Live TV, or the Guide, well &#8211; EVER &#8211; I think it should be there for those who do.</p><p>RTV had component outputs first (and VGA on some units IIRC, I don&#8217;t feel like looking it up now).  TiVo didn&#8217;t get those until the DVD units, and now on the S3 and HD.  Of course, the latter also have HDMI now.</p><p>RTV has some other bells and whistles, like being able to jump to a specific minute/second &#8211; but while those are nice &#8216;gee-whiz&#8217; things, as a geek, they aren&#8217;t really that useful as general consumer features.</p><p>TiVo always had features RTV lacked, and vice-versa.  Having tried both, I felt TiVo was simply a better DVR &#8211; it had a MUCH clearer, more reliable scheduling system and Wishlists, which were the most important functions for a DVR.  Everything else was just extra.  RTV&#8217;s scheduling system, with theme channels, etc, was obtuse and overly complex.  (Which is why RTV eventually partially copied TiVo.)  Both RTV and TiVo continued to add features &#8211; but RTV stopped over four years ago, and TiVo picked up their pace.  RTV talked about DVD combo units (I heard the interview with a SonicBlue exec myself) &#8211; TiVo delivered the product.  TiVo delivered dual tuners.  Then HD and CableCARD.</p><p>A LOT of work would need to be done to RTV&#8217;s code base to:<br
/> 1. Port it to modern hardware, dual tuners, refresh the UI, etc.<br
/> 2. Add support for DBS tuners, and probably OTA ATSC tuners as well (as DirecTVs consumer HD DVRs support ATSC and satellite).<br
/> 3. Add features to at least give it market parity to be competitive.  It would, at a minimum, need to do as much as the DirecTiVos and NDS DirecTV DVRs.</p><p>And, to make all of this harder, you&#8217;d have to get engineers to first decipher the existing code base.  One of the hardest things to do as a developer is to take someone else&#8217;s code, especially stale code, and first understand what it is all doing &#8211; and WHY it is doing it that way.  It is difficult when you have the engineers who wrote it as resources, it is damn frustrating when you don&#8217;t.  If the reports that all the old RTV engineers are long gone are true, it would be a difficult task.  And it isn&#8217;t exactly a simple code base.</p><p>TiVo already has working DirecTiVo code.  In fact, it would be trivial for them to make it feature competitive with the standalone boxes &#8211; the code is in there, just disabled by DirecTV&#8217;s request.  DirecTV and TiVo have already announced a code update for the existing boxes in 2008 &#8211; that could easily be the basis for a new platform.  And, speaking of new platforms, the TiVo HD was designed as a reference platform that can be readily re-purposed for new markets &#8211; like DVB-T for Australia.  Supporting DBS for DirecTV wouldn&#8217;t be hard.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: pog</title><link>http://www.gizmolovers.com/2007/12/13/directv-buys-the-remains-of-replaytv/comment-page-1/#comment-21891</link> <dc:creator>pog</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 06:41:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.tivolovers.com/2007/12/13/directv-buys-the-remains-of-replaytv/#comment-21891</guid> <description>You&#039;re very wrong to boldly insist that RTV&#039;s software is &quot;stale&quot; and that it needs to be &quot;modernized with all of the features required to be competitive today&quot;.  The software is so good, it&#039;s better than anything Tivo has ever created.  I could list you a plethora of features that RTV&#039;s 5 year old software offers that Tivo in all this time hasn&#039;t figured out.To name a few:- Commercial skip
- Unlimited buffer
- Recording from other sources (VCR, DVD, unlisted channels, etc)
- Line 1, Line 2, RF3 input
- Better audio/video quality all around - especially on lower settingsThe ONLY advantage Tivo has is the ability to record within the buffer.  Multi-tuners and HD are features that RTV would have easily added had they still been around.Tivo is DVR for dummies.  Click and record.  RTV&#039;s rich features was its downfall in a dumb consumer market that couldn&#039;t even figure out how to set VCR timers.RTV&#039;s 5 year old software is better than Tivo&#039;s ever was or is.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re very wrong to boldly insist that RTV&#8217;s software is &#8220;stale&#8221; and that it needs to be &#8220;modernized with all of the features required to be competitive today&#8221;.  The software is so good, it&#8217;s better than anything Tivo has ever created.  I could list you a plethora of features that RTV&#8217;s 5 year old software offers that Tivo in all this time hasn&#8217;t figured out.</p><p>To name a few:</p><p>- Commercial skip<br
/> - Unlimited buffer<br
/> - Recording from other sources (VCR, DVD, unlisted channels, etc)<br
/> - Line 1, Line 2, RF3 input<br
/> - Better audio/video quality all around &#8211; especially on lower settings</p><p>The ONLY advantage Tivo has is the ability to record within the buffer.  Multi-tuners and HD are features that RTV would have easily added had they still been around.</p><p>Tivo is DVR for dummies.  Click and record.  RTV&#8217;s rich features was its downfall in a dumb consumer market that couldn&#8217;t even figure out how to set VCR timers.</p><p>RTV&#8217;s 5 year old software is better than Tivo&#8217;s ever was or is.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: www.gizmolovers.com @ 2026-04-13 15:09:47 by W3 Total Cache -->