<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New TiVo radio ad</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmolovers.com/2006/11/20/new-tivo-radio-ad/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmolovers.com/2006/11/20/new-tivo-radio-ad/</link>
	<description>TiVo, Slingbox, Blu-ray Disc, and whatever tech I feel like blogging about...</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 17:52:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmolovers.com/2006/11/20/new-tivo-radio-ad/#comment-1756</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 13:49:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tivolovers.com/2006/11/20/new-tivo-radio-ad/#comment-1756</guid>
		<description>Personally, I think it should be legal to shoot anyone who says they got a TiVo from their cable company.  Think of it as a little chlorine in the gene pool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I think it should be legal to shoot anyone who says they got a TiVo from their cable company.  Think of it as a little chlorine in the gene pool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: melina123</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmolovers.com/2006/11/20/new-tivo-radio-ad/#comment-1755</link>
		<dc:creator>melina123</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 19:20:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tivolovers.com/2006/11/20/new-tivo-radio-ad/#comment-1755</guid>
		<description>They're trying to take steps to protect their trademark.  If a trademarked term becomes a synonym for a generic version and no longer identifies a specific brand, the company can no longer enforce its trademark.

Xerox does the same thing -- if someone uses "xerox" when they mean "photocopy" in a newspaper or magazine article, or, God help them, a dictionary, they get a nice letter from Xerox's attorneys reminding them that Xerox means only Xerox brand copiers and please don't use "xerox" as a noun (or verb) to mean just any photocopier, thankyouverymuch.

Murphy Beds lost their trademark when the term became synonomous with any brand of bed that folded into a wall.  Sony was seriously concerned about it when "Walkman" started meaning any generic portable tape player.  Kleenex and Frigidaire still have their trademarks but also tend to get touchy about it from time to time. 

TiVo's brand is everything, and I don't blame them for being as aggressive about protecting it as they can.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;re trying to take steps to protect their trademark.  If a trademarked term becomes a synonym for a generic version and no longer identifies a specific brand, the company can no longer enforce its trademark.</p>
<p>Xerox does the same thing &#8212; if someone uses &#8220;xerox&#8221; when they mean &#8220;photocopy&#8221; in a newspaper or magazine article, or, God help them, a dictionary, they get a nice letter from Xerox&#8217;s attorneys reminding them that Xerox means only Xerox brand copiers and please don&#8217;t use &#8220;xerox&#8221; as a noun (or verb) to mean just any photocopier, thankyouverymuch.</p>
<p>Murphy Beds lost their trademark when the term became synonomous with any brand of bed that folded into a wall.  Sony was seriously concerned about it when &#8220;Walkman&#8221; started meaning any generic portable tape player.  Kleenex and Frigidaire still have their trademarks but also tend to get touchy about it from time to time. </p>
<p>TiVo&#8217;s brand is everything, and I don&#8217;t blame them for being as aggressive about protecting it as they can.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
